Skip to content

Conversation

Ami-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving 'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1' macro definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95

@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:driver 'clang' and 'clang++' user-facing binaries. Not 'clang-cl' backend:loongarch labels Jun 12, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 12, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch

Author: None (Ami-zhang)

Changes

When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving 'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1' macro definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143821.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp (+1)
  • (modified) clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c (+2)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp
index 3318e498a74f9..33a655870b01b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ void loongarch::getLoongArchTargetFeatures(const Driver &D,
         Features.push_back("+lsx");
     } else /*-mno-lsx*/ {
       Features.push_back("-lsx");
+      Features.push_back("-lasx");
     }
   }
 
diff --git a/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c b/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c
index ac461b371162f..ab80449410e5c 100644
--- a/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c
+++ b/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c
@@ -946,6 +946,8 @@
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --match-full-lines --check-prefix=MNO-LSX %s
 // RUN: %clang --target=loongarch64 -mno-lasx -mno-lsx -x c -E -dM %s -o - \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --match-full-lines --check-prefix=MNO-LSX %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=loongarch64 -march=la464 -mno-lsx -x c -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --match-full-lines --check-prefix=MNO-LSX %s
 // MNO-LSX-NOT: #define __loongarch_asx
 // MNO-LSX-NOT: #define __loongarch_simd_width
 // MNO-LSX-NOT: #define __loongarch_sx

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 12, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver

Author: None (Ami-zhang)

Changes

When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving 'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1' macro definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143821.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp (+1)
  • (modified) clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c (+2)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp
index 3318e498a74f9..33a655870b01b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Arch/LoongArch.cpp
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ void loongarch::getLoongArchTargetFeatures(const Driver &D,
         Features.push_back("+lsx");
     } else /*-mno-lsx*/ {
       Features.push_back("-lsx");
+      Features.push_back("-lasx");
     }
   }
 
diff --git a/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c b/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c
index ac461b371162f..ab80449410e5c 100644
--- a/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c
+++ b/clang/test/Preprocessor/init-loongarch.c
@@ -946,6 +946,8 @@
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --match-full-lines --check-prefix=MNO-LSX %s
 // RUN: %clang --target=loongarch64 -mno-lasx -mno-lsx -x c -E -dM %s -o - \
 // RUN:   | FileCheck --match-full-lines --check-prefix=MNO-LSX %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=loongarch64 -march=la464 -mno-lsx -x c -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN:   | FileCheck --match-full-lines --check-prefix=MNO-LSX %s
 // MNO-LSX-NOT: #define __loongarch_asx
 // MNO-LSX-NOT: #define __loongarch_simd_width
 // MNO-LSX-NOT: #define __loongarch_sx

@Ami-zhang Ami-zhang requested a review from heiher June 12, 2025 01:29
When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used
together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving
'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1'
macro definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95
@SixWeining SixWeining added this to the LLVM 20.X Release milestone Jun 12, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Needs Triage in LLVM Release Status Jun 12, 2025
@Ami-zhang Ami-zhang merged commit 2ecbfc0 into llvm:main Jun 12, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Needs Triage to Done in LLVM Release Status Jun 12, 2025
@Ami-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick 2ecbfc0

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 12, 2025

/pull-request #143882

swift-ci pushed a commit to swiftlang/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
…3821)

When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used
together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving
'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1' macro
definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95

(cherry picked from commit 2ecbfc0)
tomtor pushed a commit to tomtor/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2025
…3821)

When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used
together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving
'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1' macro
definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95
akuhlens pushed a commit to akuhlens/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
…3821)

When '-march' with LASX feature and '-mno-lsx' options are used
together, '-mno-lsx' fails to disable LASX, leaving
'HasFeatureLASX=true' and causing incorrect '__loongarch_sx/asx=1' macro
definition.

Fixes loongson-community/discussions#95
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend:loongarch clang:driver 'clang' and 'clang++' user-facing binaries. Not 'clang-cl' clang Clang issues not falling into any other category
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GCC and Clang have different priorities between -march and -mno-lsx
3 participants