[mlir][spirv] Use ODS generated attribute names for op definitions #81552
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-core @llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-spirv Author: None (tw-ilson) ChangesPatch is 25.49 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81552.diff 9 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/AtomicOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/AtomicOps.cpp
index 7e33e91414e0bf..d84133d5933415 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/AtomicOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/AtomicOps.cpp
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ static LogicalResult verifyAtomicUpdateOp(Operation *op) {
<< stringifyTypeName<ExpectedElementType>()
<< " value, found " << elementType;
+ StringRef semanticsAttrName = spirv::AtomicAndOp::getSemanticsAttrName(op->getName()).strref();
auto memorySemantics =
- op->getAttrOfType<spirv::MemorySemanticsAttr>(kSemanticsAttrName)
+ op->getAttrOfType<spirv::MemorySemanticsAttr>(semanticsAttrName)
.getValue();
if (failed(verifyMemorySemantics(op, memorySemantics))) {
return failure();
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/ControlFlowOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/ControlFlowOps.cpp
index 580782043c81b4..650b5448f041b5 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/ControlFlowOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/ControlFlowOps.cpp
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ ParseResult BranchConditionalOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
parser.parseRSquare())
return failure();
- result.addAttribute(kBranchWeightAttrName,
+ result.addAttribute(BranchConditionalOp::getBranchWeightsAttrName(result.name).strref(),
builder.getArrayAttr({trueWeight, falseWeight}));
}
@@ -199,11 +199,11 @@ LogicalResult FunctionCallOp::verify() {
}
CallInterfaceCallable FunctionCallOp::getCallableForCallee() {
- return (*this)->getAttrOfType<SymbolRefAttr>(kCallee);
+ return (*this)->getAttrOfType<SymbolRefAttr>(FunctionCallOp::getCalleeAttrName((*this)->getName()).strref());
}
void FunctionCallOp::setCalleeFromCallable(CallInterfaceCallable callee) {
- (*this)->setAttr(kCallee, callee.get<SymbolRefAttr>());
+ (*this)->setAttr(FunctionCallOp::getCalleeAttrName((*this)->getName()).strref(), callee.get<SymbolRefAttr>());
}
Operation::operand_range FunctionCallOp::getArgOperands() {
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/GroupOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/GroupOps.cpp
index ac29ab0db586cf..ea82f8442dcfe0 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/GroupOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/GroupOps.cpp
@@ -26,9 +26,9 @@ static ParseResult parseGroupNonUniformArithmeticOp(OpAsmParser &parser,
GroupOperation groupOperation;
OpAsmParser::UnresolvedOperand valueInfo;
if (spirv::parseEnumStrAttr<spirv::ScopeAttr>(executionScope, parser, state,
- kExecutionScopeAttrName) ||
+ ControlBarrierOp::getExecutionScopeAttrName(state.name).strref()) ||
spirv::parseEnumStrAttr<GroupOperationAttr>(groupOperation, parser, state,
- kGroupOperationAttrName) ||
+ GroupFAddOp::getGroupOperationAttrName(state.name).strref()) ||
parser.parseOperand(valueInfo))
return failure();
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static void printGroupNonUniformArithmeticOp(Operation *groupOp,
printer
<< " \""
<< stringifyScope(
- groupOp->getAttrOfType<spirv::ScopeAttr>(kExecutionScopeAttrName)
+ groupOp->getAttrOfType<spirv::ScopeAttr>(ControlBarrierOp::getExecutionScopeAttrName(groupOp->getName()).strref())
.getValue())
<< "\" \""
<< stringifyGroupOperation(
- groupOp->getAttrOfType<GroupOperationAttr>(kGroupOperationAttrName)
+ groupOp->getAttrOfType<GroupOperationAttr>(GroupFAddOp::getGroupOperationAttrName(groupOp->getName()).strref())
.getValue())
<< "\" " << groupOp->getOperand(0);
@@ -76,14 +76,14 @@ static void printGroupNonUniformArithmeticOp(Operation *groupOp,
static LogicalResult verifyGroupNonUniformArithmeticOp(Operation *groupOp) {
spirv::Scope scope =
- groupOp->getAttrOfType<spirv::ScopeAttr>(kExecutionScopeAttrName)
+ groupOp->getAttrOfType<spirv::ScopeAttr>(ControlBarrierOp::getExecutionScopeAttrName(groupOp->getName()).strref())
.getValue();
if (scope != spirv::Scope::Workgroup && scope != spirv::Scope::Subgroup)
return groupOp->emitOpError(
"execution scope must be 'Workgroup' or 'Subgroup'");
GroupOperation operation =
- groupOp->getAttrOfType<GroupOperationAttr>(kGroupOperationAttrName)
+ groupOp->getAttrOfType<GroupOperationAttr>(GroupFAddOp::getGroupOperationAttrName(groupOp->getName()).strref())
.getValue();
if (operation == GroupOperation::ClusteredReduce &&
groupOp->getNumOperands() == 1)
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/IntegerDotProductOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/IntegerDotProductOps.cpp
index 00fc2acf7f07d0..3abc4361321d04 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/IntegerDotProductOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/IntegerDotProductOps.cpp
@@ -33,10 +33,11 @@ static LogicalResult verifyIntegerDotProduct(Operation *op) {
// ODS enforces that vector 1 and vector 2, and result and the accumulator
// have the same types.
Type factorTy = op->getOperand(0).getType();
+ StringRef packedVectorFormatAttrName = SDotAccSatOp::getFormatAttrName(op->getName()).strref();
if (auto intTy = llvm::dyn_cast<IntegerType>(factorTy)) {
auto packedVectorFormat =
llvm::dyn_cast_or_null<spirv::PackedVectorFormatAttr>(
- op->getAttr(kPackedVectorFormatAttrName));
+ op->getAttr(packedVectorFormatAttrName));
if (!packedVectorFormat)
return op->emitOpError("requires Packed Vector Format attribute for "
"integer vector operands");
@@ -50,7 +51,7 @@ static LogicalResult verifyIntegerDotProduct(Operation *op) {
"integer vector operands to be 32-bits wide",
packedVectorFormat.getValue()));
} else {
- if (op->hasAttr(kPackedVectorFormatAttrName))
+ if (op->hasAttr(packedVectorFormatAttrName))
return op->emitOpError(llvm::formatv(
"with invalid format attribute for vector operands of type '{0}'",
factorTy));
@@ -99,9 +100,10 @@ getIntegerDotProductCapabilities(Operation *op) {
SmallVector<ArrayRef<spirv::Capability>, 1> capabilities = {dotProductCap};
Type factorTy = op->getOperand(0).getType();
+ StringRef packedVectorFormatAttrName = SDotAccSatOp::getFormatAttrName(op->getName()).strref();
if (auto intTy = llvm::dyn_cast<IntegerType>(factorTy)) {
auto formatAttr = llvm::cast<spirv::PackedVectorFormatAttr>(
- op->getAttr(kPackedVectorFormatAttrName));
+ op->getAttr(packedVectorFormatAttrName));
if (formatAttr.getValue() ==
spirv::PackedVectorFormat::PackedVectorFormat4x8Bit)
capabilities.push_back(dotProductInput4x8BitPackedCap);
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/MemoryOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/MemoryOps.cpp
index 0df59e42218b55..eb7900fd6ef8fb 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/MemoryOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/MemoryOps.cpp
@@ -38,17 +38,19 @@ static ParseResult parseSourceMemoryAccessAttributes(OpAsmParser &parser,
}
spirv::MemoryAccess memoryAccessAttr;
+ StringRef memoryAccessAttrName = CopyMemoryOp::getMemoryAccessAttrName(state.name).strref();
if (spirv::parseEnumStrAttr<spirv::MemoryAccessAttr>(
- memoryAccessAttr, parser, state, kSourceMemoryAccessAttrName))
+ memoryAccessAttr, parser, state, memoryAccessAttrName))
return failure();
if (spirv::bitEnumContainsAll(memoryAccessAttr,
spirv::MemoryAccess::Aligned)) {
// Parse integer attribute for alignment.
Attribute alignmentAttr;
+ StringRef alignmentAttrName = CopyMemoryOp::getSourceAlignmentAttrName(state.name).strref();
Type i32Type = parser.getBuilder().getIntegerType(32);
if (parser.parseComma() ||
- parser.parseAttribute(alignmentAttr, i32Type, kSourceAlignmentAttrName,
+ parser.parseAttribute(alignmentAttr, i32Type, alignmentAttrName,
state.attributes)) {
return failure();
}
@@ -72,7 +74,7 @@ static void printSourceMemoryAccessAttribute(
// Print optional memory access attribute.
if (auto memAccess = (memoryAccessAtrrValue ? memoryAccessAtrrValue
: memoryOp.getMemoryAccess())) {
- elidedAttrs.push_back(kSourceMemoryAccessAttrName);
+ elidedAttrs.push_back(memoryOp.getSourceMemoryAccessAttrName().strref());
printer << " [\"" << stringifyMemoryAccess(*memAccess) << "\"";
@@ -80,7 +82,7 @@ static void printSourceMemoryAccessAttribute(
// Print integer alignment attribute.
if (auto alignment = (alignmentAttrValue ? alignmentAttrValue
: memoryOp.getAlignment())) {
- elidedAttrs.push_back(kSourceAlignmentAttrName);
+ elidedAttrs.push_back(memoryOp.getSourceAlignmentAttrName().strref());
printer << ", " << *alignment;
}
}
@@ -98,7 +100,7 @@ static void printMemoryAccessAttribute(
// Print optional memory access attribute.
if (auto memAccess = (memoryAccessAtrrValue ? memoryAccessAtrrValue
: memoryOp.getMemoryAccess())) {
- elidedAttrs.push_back(kMemoryAccessAttrName);
+ elidedAttrs.push_back(memoryOp.getMemoryAccessAttrName().strref());
printer << " [\"" << stringifyMemoryAccess(*memAccess) << "\"";
@@ -106,7 +108,7 @@ static void printMemoryAccessAttribute(
// Print integer alignment attribute.
if (auto alignment = (alignmentAttrValue ? alignmentAttrValue
: memoryOp.getAlignment())) {
- elidedAttrs.push_back(kAlignmentAttrName);
+ elidedAttrs.push_back(memoryOp.getAlignmentAttrName().strref());
printer << ", " << *alignment;
}
}
@@ -136,11 +138,11 @@ static LogicalResult verifyMemoryAccessAttribute(MemoryOpTy memoryOp) {
// memory-access attribute is Aligned, then the alignment attribute must be
// present.
auto *op = memoryOp.getOperation();
- auto memAccessAttr = op->getAttr(kMemoryAccessAttrName);
+ auto memAccessAttr = op->getAttr(memoryOp.getMemoryAccessAttrName().strref());
if (!memAccessAttr) {
// Alignment attribute shouldn't be present if memory access attribute is
// not present.
- if (op->getAttr(kAlignmentAttrName)) {
+ if (op->getAttr(memoryOp.getAlignmentAttrName().strref())) {
return memoryOp.emitOpError(
"invalid alignment specification without aligned memory access "
"specification");
@@ -157,11 +159,11 @@ static LogicalResult verifyMemoryAccessAttribute(MemoryOpTy memoryOp) {
if (spirv::bitEnumContainsAll(memAccess.getValue(),
spirv::MemoryAccess::Aligned)) {
- if (!op->getAttr(kAlignmentAttrName)) {
+ if (!op->getAttr(memoryOp.getAlignmentAttrName().strref())) {
return memoryOp.emitOpError("missing alignment value");
}
} else {
- if (op->getAttr(kAlignmentAttrName)) {
+ if (op->getAttr(memoryOp.getAlignmentAttrName().strref())) {
return memoryOp.emitOpError(
"invalid alignment specification with non-aligned memory access "
"specification");
@@ -180,11 +182,11 @@ static LogicalResult verifySourceMemoryAccessAttribute(MemoryOpTy memoryOp) {
// memory-access attribute is Aligned, then the alignment attribute must be
// present.
auto *op = memoryOp.getOperation();
- auto memAccessAttr = op->getAttr(kSourceMemoryAccessAttrName);
+ auto memAccessAttr = op->getAttr(memoryOp.getSourceMemoryAccessAttrName().strref());
if (!memAccessAttr) {
// Alignment attribute shouldn't be present if memory access attribute is
// not present.
- if (op->getAttr(kSourceAlignmentAttrName)) {
+ if (op->getAttr(memoryOp.getSourceAlignmentAttrName().strref())) {
return memoryOp.emitOpError(
"invalid alignment specification without aligned memory access "
"specification");
@@ -201,11 +203,11 @@ static LogicalResult verifySourceMemoryAccessAttribute(MemoryOpTy memoryOp) {
if (spirv::bitEnumContainsAll(memAccess.getValue(),
spirv::MemoryAccess::Aligned)) {
- if (!op->getAttr(kSourceAlignmentAttrName)) {
+ if (!op->getAttr(memoryOp.getSourceAlignmentAttrName().strref())) {
return memoryOp.emitOpError("missing alignment value");
}
} else {
- if (op->getAttr(kSourceAlignmentAttrName)) {
+ if (op->getAttr(memoryOp.getSourceAlignmentAttrName().strref())) {
return memoryOp.emitOpError(
"invalid alignment specification with non-aligned memory access "
"specification");
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVOps.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVOps.cpp
index 50035c917137e3..c27df9e30f24e3 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVOps.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/SPIRV/IR/SPIRVOps.cpp
@@ -457,12 +457,13 @@ ParseResult spirv::CompositeExtractOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
OperationState &result) {
OpAsmParser::UnresolvedOperand compositeInfo;
Attribute indicesAttr;
+ StringRef indicesAttrName = spirv::CompositeExtractOp::getIndicesAttrName(result.name).strref();
Type compositeType;
SMLoc attrLocation;
if (parser.parseOperand(compositeInfo) ||
parser.getCurrentLocation(&attrLocation) ||
- parser.parseAttribute(indicesAttr, kIndicesAttrName, result.attributes) ||
+ parser.parseAttribute(indicesAttr, indicesAttrName, result.attributes) ||
parser.parseColonType(compositeType) ||
parser.resolveOperand(compositeInfo, compositeType, result.operands)) {
return failure();
@@ -513,11 +514,12 @@ ParseResult spirv::CompositeInsertOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
SmallVector<OpAsmParser::UnresolvedOperand, 2> operands;
Type objectType, compositeType;
Attribute indicesAttr;
+ StringRef indicesAttrName = spirv::CompositeInsertOp::getIndicesAttrName(result.name).strref();
auto loc = parser.getCurrentLocation();
return failure(
parser.parseOperandList(operands, 2) ||
- parser.parseAttribute(indicesAttr, kIndicesAttrName, result.attributes) ||
+ parser.parseAttribute(indicesAttr, indicesAttrName, result.attributes) ||
parser.parseColonType(objectType) ||
parser.parseKeywordType("into", compositeType) ||
parser.resolveOperands(operands, {objectType, compositeType}, loc,
@@ -559,7 +561,8 @@ void spirv::CompositeInsertOp::print(OpAsmPrinter &printer) {
ParseResult spirv::ConstantOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
OperationState &result) {
Attribute value;
- if (parser.parseAttribute(value, kValueAttrName, result.attributes))
+ StringRef valueAttrName = spirv::ConstantOp::getValueAttrName(result.name).strref();
+ if (parser.parseAttribute(value, valueAttrName, result.attributes))
return failure();
Type type = NoneType::get(parser.getContext());
@@ -822,7 +825,7 @@ ParseResult spirv::EntryPointOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
}))
return failure();
}
- result.addAttribute(kInterfaceAttrName,
+ result.addAttribute(spirv::EntryPointOp::getInterfaceAttrName(result.name).strref(),
parser.getBuilder().getArrayAttr(interfaceVars));
return success();
}
@@ -875,7 +878,8 @@ ParseResult spirv::ExecutionModeOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
}
values.push_back(llvm::cast<IntegerAttr>(value).getInt());
}
- result.addAttribute(kValuesAttrName,
+ StringRef valuesAttrName = spirv::ExecutionModeOp::getValuesAttrName(result.name).strref();
+ result.addAttribute(valuesAttrName,
parser.getBuilder().getI32ArrayAttr(values));
return success();
}
@@ -1150,16 +1154,17 @@ ParseResult spirv::GlobalVariableOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
OperationState &result) {
// Parse variable name.
StringAttr nameAttr;
+ StringRef initializerAttrName = spirv::GlobalVariableOp::getInitializerAttrName(result.name).strref();
if (parser.parseSymbolName(nameAttr, SymbolTable::getSymbolAttrName(),
result.attributes)) {
return failure();
}
// Parse optional initializer
- if (succeeded(parser.parseOptionalKeyword(kInitializerAttrName))) {
+ if (succeeded(parser.parseOptionalKeyword(initializerAttrName))) {
FlatSymbolRefAttr initSymbol;
if (parser.parseLParen() ||
- parser.parseAttribute(initSymbol, Type(), kInitializerAttrName,
+ parser.parseAttribute(initSymbol, Type(), initializerAttrName,
result.attributes) ||
parser.parseRParen())
return failure();
@@ -1170,6 +1175,7 @@ ParseResult spirv::GlobalVariableOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
}
Type type;
+ StringRef typeAttrName = spirv::GlobalVariableOp::getTypeAttrName(result.name).strref();
auto loc = parser.getCurrentLocation();
if (parser.parseColonType(type)) {
return failure();
@@ -1177,7 +1183,7 @@ ParseResult spirv::GlobalVariableOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
if (!llvm::isa<spirv::PointerType>(type)) {
return parser.emitError(loc, "expected spirv.ptr type");
}
- result.addAttribute(kTypeAttrName, TypeAttr::get(type));
+ result.addAttribute(typeAttrName, TypeAttr::get(type));
return success();
}
@@ -1191,15 +1197,17 @@ void spirv::GlobalVariableOp::print(OpAsmPrinter &printer) {
printer.printSymbolName(getSymName());
elidedAttrs.push_back(SymbolTable::getSymbolAttrName());
+ StringRef initializerAttrName = this->getInitializerAttrName().strref();
// Print optional initializer
if (auto initializer = this->getInitializer()) {
- printer << " " << kInitializerAttrName << '(';
+ printer << " " << initializerAttrName << '(';
printer.printSymbolName(*initializer);
printer << ')';
- elidedAttrs.push_back(kInitializerAttrName);
+ elidedAttrs.push_back(initializerAttrName);
}
- elidedAttrs.push_back(kTypeAttrName);
+ StringRef typeAttrName = this->getTypeAttrName().strref();
+ elidedAttrs.push_back(typeAttrName);
spirv::printVariableDecorations(*this, printer, elidedAttrs);
printer << " : " << getType();
}
@@ -1220,7 +1228,7 @@ LogicalResult spirv::GlobalVariableOp::verify() {
}
if (auto init =
- (*this)->getAttrOfType<FlatSymbolRefAttr>(kInitializerAttrName)) {
+ (*this)->getAttrOfType<FlatSymbolRefAttr>(this->getInitializerAttrName().strref())) {
Operation *initOp = SymbolTable::lookupNearestSymbolFrom(
(*this)->getParentOp(), init.getAttr());
// TODO: Currently only variable initialization with specialization
@@ -1594,6 +1602,7 @@ ParseResult spirv::SpecConstantOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
OperationState &result) {
StringAttr nameAttr;
Attribute valueAttr;
+ StringRef defaultValueAttrName = spirv::SpecConstantOp::getDefaultValueAttrName(result.name).strref();
if (parser.parseSymbolName(nameAttr, SymbolTable::getSymbolAttrName(),
result.attributes))
@@ -1609,7 +1618,7 @@ ParseResult spirv::SpecConstantOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
}
if (parser.parseEqual() ||
- parser.parseAttribute(valueAttr, kDefaultValueAttrName,
+ parser.parseAttribute(valueAttr, defaultValueAttrName,
result.attributes))
return failure();
@@ -1783,14 +1792,16 @@ ParseResult spirv::SpecConstantCompositeOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser,
if (parser.parseRParen())
return failure();
- result.addAttribute(kCompositeSpecConstituentsName,
+ StringRef compositeSpecConstituentsName = spirv::SpecConstantCompositeOp::getConstituentsAttrName(result.name).strref();
+ result.addAttribute(compositeSpecConstituentsName,
parser.getBuilder().getArrayAttr(constituents));
Type type;
if (parser.parseColonType(type))
return failure();
- result.addAttribute(kTypeAttrName, TypeAttr::get(type));
+ StringRef typeAttrName = spirv::SpecConstantCompositeOp::getTypeAttrName(result.name).strref();
+ result.addAttribute(typeAttrName, TypeAttr::get(type));
return success();
}
diff --git a/mlir/...
[truncated]
|
tw-ilson
changed the title
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
joker-eph
reviewed
Feb 13, 2024
| @@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ static LogicalResult verifyAtomicUpdateOp(Operation *op) { | |||
| << stringifyTypeName<ExpectedElementType>() | |||
| << " value, found " << elementType; | |||
|
|
|||
| StringRef semanticsAttrName = spirv::AtomicAndOp::getSemanticsAttrName(op->getName()).strref(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't quite get why you use StringRef here?
Can we stick to StringAttr instead? This will make it use pointer comparison instead of string comparisons.
|
added templated functions instead of removing assert from codegen |
joker-eph
reviewed
Feb 15, 2024
| @@ -875,7 +882,9 @@ ParseResult spirv::ExecutionModeOp::parse(OpAsmParser &parser, | |||
| } | |||
| values.push_back(llvm::cast<IntegerAttr>(value).getInt()); | |||
| } | |||
| result.addAttribute(kValuesAttrName, | |||
| StringRef valuesAttrName = | |||
| spirv::ExecutionModeOp::getValuesAttrName(result.name).strref(); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
whoops.
Otherwise good though?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I only superficially looked, this will be more for @antiagainst to approve I think.
I would mentioned that this PR would benefit from a description (the title says the "what" is done, the description should say the "why" and provide context).
(See https://mlir.llvm.org/getting_started/Contributing/#commit-messages )
antiagainst
changed the title
antiagainst
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Awesome, thanks for helping to fix this! I just have a few nits; but given it has been some time waiting for reviews (sorry!) so I just went ahead fixed them with cb22157.
|
@tw-ilson Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since ODS generates getters functions for SPIRV operations' attribute names, we replace instances of these hardcoded strings in the SPIR-V dialect's op parser/printer with function calls for consistency.
Fixes #77627