[Backport] use "Module_Name::template/path" format instead of using template/path #15106
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
magento-engcom-team
added
Release Line: 2.1
Partner: Atwix
|
Hi @sergiy-v. Thank you for your contribution. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in Block class to ensure extensibility of the class. not doing so causes invalid template errors after extending the block class via preference
Original PR: #14946.
Description
Often third party modules override core block classes. If the source block classes reference a template without specifying module name like "Vendor_Module::template_path" then block render fails with "nvalid template file: " error.
Manual testing scenarios
Overide the \Magento\Review\Block\Product\ReviewRenderer Block in your custom module via di preference. Leave your custom class empty.
Product details should work.