Skip to content

Support import maps and bare import specifiersΒ #43326

Open
@bahrus

Description

@bahrus

Suggestion

πŸ” Search Terms

  1. import maps
  2. bare import specifiers

βœ… Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

⭐ Suggestion

As import maps are part of Chrome (as of version 89), and Firefox has given a nod of approval, it would be great if Typescript embraced this cross-package import syntax.

Import maps assume an index.html (for example) file with a script tag, e.g.:

<script type="importmap">
{
  "imports": {
    "moment": "/node_modules/moment/src/moment.js",
    "lodash": "/node_modules/lodash-es/lodash.js"
  }
}
</script>

I would suggest being able to

  1. Point to a file containing such an importmap in tsconfig and/or
  2. Just supporting bare import specifiers, based on package.json/package-lock.json, the way unpkg.com is able to do..

πŸ“ƒ Motivating Example

Now you can reference cross-package JS files seamlessly, without bundling tools, based on browser standards.

Workaround:

The path resolution Typescript provides is inadequate, and quite unhelpful.

The only fairly reliable workaround I've found is cloning the repo to a sibling folder of my project.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Needs ProposalThis issue needs a plan that clarifies the finer details of how it could be implemented.SuggestionAn idea for TypeScript

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions