-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
expose jsdoc factory #29539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
expose jsdoc factory #29539
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2265a51
expose jsdoc factory
Kingwl 868fce5
refactor jsdoc factory
Kingwl 6ea2418
correctly jsdoc factory types
Kingwl 1cfa651
update jsdoc factory
Kingwl 76937c3
Add check for delete expression must be optional
Kingwl b536776
Merge branch 'master' into expose-jsdoc-factory
Kingwl 5a76afe
accept new basseline
Kingwl 2285fa3
Revert "Add check for delete expression must be optional"
Kingwl 6c4b439
remove newline
Kingwl 61e16d4
make linter happy
Kingwl e577f7e
Add deprecated comment
Kingwl d5dfc2a
Merge branch 'master' into expose-jsdoc-factory
sandersn 31bf102
Merge branch 'master' into expose-jsdoc-factory
sandersn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why have both
createJSDocParameterTag
andcreateJSDocParamTag
. The only real difference is that this setsisNameFirst
butcreateJSDocParamTag
doesn't.Naively, it feels to me like we should only have one, which uses this code but is named
createJSDocParamTag
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, except that we shouldn't break the API unnecessarily. Ugh. Can you add documentation saying that
createJSDocParamTag
is deprecated and that this is the preferred function now?