-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
A second attempt at readonly array support persisting through isArray #42316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,8 +1,12 @@ | ||
tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardsWithInstanceOf.ts(7,20): error TS2339: Property 'global' does not exist on type 'never'. | ||
The intersection 'I & RegExp' was reduced to 'never' because property 'global' has conflicting types in some constituents. | ||
tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardsWithInstanceOf.ts(31,11): error TS2339: Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C | (Validator & Partial<OnChanges>)'. | ||
Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C'. | ||
tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardsWithInstanceOf.ts(32,11): error TS2339: Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C | (Validator & Partial<OnChanges>)'. | ||
Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C'. | ||
|
||
|
||
==== tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardsWithInstanceOf.ts (1 errors) ==== | ||
==== tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardsWithInstanceOf.ts (3 errors) ==== | ||
interface I { global: string; } | ||
var result!: I; | ||
var result2!: I; | ||
|
@@ -37,7 +41,13 @@ tests/cases/conformance/expressions/typeGuards/typeGuardsWithInstanceOf.ts(7,20) | |
} | ||
v // Validator & Partial<OnChanges> via subtype reduction | ||
if (v.onChanges) { | ||
~~~~~~~~~ | ||
!!! error TS2339: Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C | (Validator & Partial<OnChanges>)'. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. this looks like a regression. I reported this case back then, because the effect of |
||
!!! error TS2339: Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C'. | ||
v.onChanges({}); | ||
~~~~~~~~~ | ||
!!! error TS2339: Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C | (Validator & Partial<OnChanges>)'. | ||
!!! error TS2339: Property 'onChanges' does not exist on type 'C'. | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a safer type, but it can't help but break anybody who was previously able to mutate an array or use its contents after checking it with isArray. I think it's too breaky for the benefit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sandersn You mean anybody who was previously able to mutate a mutable array after checking it with isArray? I tested this change locally and confirmed it doesn't break that: Mutable arrays remain mutable. The type predicate narrows the type to the intersection of
typeof arg & readonly unknown[]
, which is only immutable ifarg
was already immutable.Would you consider reopening this PR?
⏯️ Playground link
Workbench repro.
🧑💻 Code
🙁 Actual behavior
No errors: You're free to mutate an immutable array.
🙂 Expected behavior
With this PR:
Mutating an immutable array is an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I mean is that if somebody writes this today, it's not an error:
unknown
narrowing is an important scenario for Array.isArray, and this change would add errors that were not there before and are not necessarily correct.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sandersn I should've realized what you meant, thanks for your patience.
Instead of replacing the existing signature, would adding overloads for
ArrayLike<T>
andIterable<T>
work, without affecting the current behavior ofany
andunknown
? I've opened #48228 with that modification to this PR.