Add tests case for function check type being correctly paranthesized in quick info #48836
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #48729
I've noticed that this already works in nightly and narrowed it down to
4.7.0-dev.20220406, see the playground.Then I was able to bisect this to 7da80d7 introduced by #48112 . I think that the improvement comes from refactoring common
parenthesizeMemberOfConditionalTypeinto specialized functions likeparenthesizeCheckTypeOfConditionalType& co.I didn't see any specific test case added/adjusted in this PR that would be specific to this situation so I've decided to add one, cc @rbuckton