Add 'not a request for a utility type' to the feature issue template #55746
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
typescript-bot
added
Author: Team
For Uncommitted Bug
|
I probably laughed harder at the title of this PR than I want to admit. 😄 It's definitely true, asks for new utility types are right up there with 9998 dupes and bug reports about type narrowing not working for dynamically keyed objects. And yeah, there should probably be a contributor FAQ for this kind of thing (assuming there isn't already). It's like how people aren't supposed to submit typo fixes, it doesn't really seem to be documented except in other issues and maybe the issue template, so the usual recourse is just to dupe to a random rejected issue of the same type, which isn't really an ideal way to communicate policy. |
5 tasks
5 tasks
This was referenced Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please do bikeshed the wording, but I think we should probably have a checklist item for this given a non-trivial amount of asks for this which we immediately decline unless it's paired with some other need.