-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
Consider annotated parameter with an initializer as optional when inferring from it #57708
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Consider annotated parameter with an initializer as optional when inferring from it #57708
Conversation
src/compiler/checker.ts
Outdated
@@ -36542,7 +36542,7 @@ export function createTypeChecker(host: TypeCheckerHost): TypeChecker { | |||
const declaration = signature.parameters[i].valueDeclaration as ParameterDeclaration; | |||
const typeNode = getEffectiveTypeAnnotationNode(declaration); | |||
if (typeNode) { | |||
const source = addOptionality(getTypeFromTypeNode(typeNode), /*isProperty*/ false, isOptionalDeclaration(declaration)); | |||
const source = addOptionality(getTypeFromTypeNode(typeNode), /*isProperty*/ false, hasInitializer(declaration) || isOptionalDeclaration(declaration)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this matches the logic used by getTypeOfParameter
…aram-with-initializer
@typescript-bot test it |
Hey @jakebailey, the results of running the DT tests are ready. Everything looks the same! |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the user tests with tsc comparing Everything looks good! |
@jakebailey Here they are:
tscComparison Report - baseline..pr
System info unknown
Hosts
Scenarios
Developer Information: |
@jakebailey Here are the results of running the top 400 repos with tsc comparing Everything looks good! |
fixes #57706