Skip to content

Conversation

jackgerrits
Copy link
Contributor

@jackgerrits jackgerrits commented Mar 6, 2024

Why are these changes needed?

Adds the following to the website:

  • agentchat_capability_long_context_handling.ipynb
  • agentchat_chess.ipynb
  • agentchat_compression.ipynb
  • agentchat_custom_model.ipynb
  • agentchat_groupchat_research.ipynb
  • agentchat_teachability.ipynb
  • agentchat_teaching.ipynb

Related issue number

Checks

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 37.30%. Comparing base (c75655a) to head (4e74bf3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1890   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   37.30%   37.30%           
=======================================
  Files          64       64           
  Lines        6910     6910           
  Branches     1519     1519           
=======================================
  Hits         2578     2578           
  Misses       4109     4109           
  Partials      223      223           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 37.30% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@qingyun-wu qingyun-wu mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024
3 tasks
@rickyloynd-microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

The new requirements section of agentchat_teachability.ipynb now looks like this:

image

Is that the expected formatting?

@jackgerrits
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, that is expected. That renders as an admonition on the website

Copy link
Contributor

@rickyloynd-microsoft rickyloynd-microsoft left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@sonichi
Copy link
Contributor

sonichi commented Mar 9, 2024

Could you resolve the conflict?

@jackgerrits
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sonichi resolved

@sonichi
Copy link
Contributor

sonichi commented Mar 9, 2024

I see
image

@jackgerrits
Copy link
Contributor Author

okay that one is resolved now too

@sonichi sonichi added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 00e097d Mar 10, 2024
whiskyboy pushed a commit to whiskyboy/autogen that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2024
* Update more notebooks to be available on the website

* fix notebook

* update link
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants