Use suid so the container does not need to be started as root or have sudo configured

[felipecrs]

The docker-debian.sh relies on the container being started as root or to have sudo properly configured.

To get rid of this requirement, we can use the suid bit so the script has permission to as root by itself. I made a small project to prove that it works, by using shc, the Shell Script Compiler, to make such thing work with shell scripts. See fixdockergid.

At the end, we could have a very less intrusive docker run call to start the container:

docker run -u "$(id -u):$(id -g)" -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock ubuntu-with-fixdockergid

And the Dockerfile can still have the USER vscode as its last statement.

[PavelSosin-320]

I vote for it with another use-case: "Native docker running inside WSL2 distro (CentOS) listening standard /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock." Docker itself is much more stable and secure than Docker-for-Windows due to pure enterprise origin and docker CLI and docker-compose come as platform packages.

[felipecrs]

I vote for it with another use-case: "Native docker running inside WSL2 distro (CentOS) listening standard /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock." Docker itself is much more stable and secure than Docker-for-Windows due to pure enterprise origin and docker CLI and docker-compose come as platform packages.

I didn't quite understand... can you elaborate?

[Chuxel]

@felipecassiors The script that is referenced is a bit smarter than the simplistic description in the README... which is intended to "just work" on all platforms. If it detects the group on the socket is not "0", it creates a group and adds the user to it. The socat version is a final fallback since I'm finding that on Windows and macOS, the group is zero in some cases but not others (e.g. WSL it might not be, but hyper-v and macOS it is). That isn't really needed on Linux in most cases, but I don't want to just chown the socket for macOS/Windows since on Linux that would update the host.

Basically, the script should do the right thing when possible and then fall back to the socat approach as a final fallback.

Check out https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-dev-containers/blob/master/script-library/docker-debian.sh the "docker-init.sh" script is embedded in it just to have a single file to do the work.

Is that what you are getting at?

[felipecrs]

@Chuxel you're right. The script already performs the necessary changes to the docker group in the container or even creates it.

The disadvantage of it against the fixdockergid approach is that it relies on either:

1. The container being started as root
2. sudo installed and configured (SUDOERS)

You can get rid of those requirements by setting the suid bit. The fixdockergid is one example of how it can be used on shell scripts, with the shc compiler.

[Chuxel]

Yeah, the the issue is extensions like "Docker" access the socket directly rather than through the CLI, so I'm not sure setting that bit on the docker CLI resolves the problem. The specific problem here is that the socket itself.. and thus the underlying GID and UID on the host, is "root" -- intentionally.

That said, we could probably drop the use of sudo if we set the suid bit on the shell scripts - that's a good idea.

There's code that updates the UID/GID if the remoteUser is set in the core of the extension, but this doesn't try to scan the whole filesystem to make updates given the potential perf implications of that. Not sure if @chrmarti looked at using fixuid for that functionality already.

[felipecrs]

That said, we could probably drop the use of sudo if we set the suid bit on the shell scripts - that's a good idea.

Exactly, that's the point.

There's code that updates the UID/GID if the remoteUser is set in the core of the extension, but this doesn't try to scan the whole filesystem to make updates given the potential perf implications of that. Not sure if @chrmarti looked at using fixuid for that functionality already.

I don't think there are significant performance implications, but need to evaluate.

[felipecrs]

I rewrote this Issue to point the real proposal.

[PavelSosin-320]

The standard way to enable access to the docker by any user is documented in every "native" docker installation guide: docker installation creates a docker user group and every user who belongs to this group has access to docker. For example, I run native docker in CentOS 7 distro that has my user, created and assigned to the docker user group and I can use docker without any sudo or wsl -u root just because my login user belongs to the docker group. The assignment is done once because users and groups are persistent in the Linux distro.
Indeed, I disabled SELINUX in my distro because I don't see such a security level is relevant for WSL. It means some security compromise.
When docker or podman are installed on SELINUX distro as a platform package from the corresponding repository the installation takes MAC security into account and such docker installation can pass the most rigorous security check.