Skip to content

Clean up tool execution in Refactoring feature of extension #353

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
DonJayamanne opened this issue Dec 5, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #425
Closed

Clean up tool execution in Refactoring feature of extension #353

DonJayamanne opened this issue Dec 5, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #425
Assignees
@DonJayamanne
Labels
debt Covers everything internal: CI, testing, refactoring of the codebase, etc.
Milestone
January 2018

Comments

@DonJayamanne
Copy link

No description provided.

@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne added awaiting 2-PR debt Covers everything internal: CI, testing, refactoring of the codebase, etc. labels Dec 5, 2017
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne self-assigned this Dec 5, 2017
@brettcannon brettcannon mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2017
Closed
10 tasks
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne mentioned this issue Dec 14, 2017
Merged
DonJayamanne added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 15, 2017
@DonJayamanne
Make use of new execution layer instead of spawning processes (#425)
660c3c5 
Fixes #353
* use new exec engine instead of spawning manually
* fixed code review comments
@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne added this to the January 2018 milestone Dec 15, 2017
@brettcannon brettcannon mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2018
Closed
38 tasks
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 12, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@DonJayamanne DonJayamanne

Labels
debt Covers everything internal: CI, testing, refactoring of the codebase, etc.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
January 2018
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Make use of new execution layer instead of spawning processes DonJayamanne/pythonVSCode
2 participants
@brettcannon @DonJayamanne