Skip to content

Conversation

drewazarias-dev
Copy link

@drewazarias-dev drewazarias-dev commented Oct 1, 2025

  1. Changed the format for consistency ("Step1" to "Step 1")

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected minor typographical issues in step headings to improve readability and consistency (e.g., “Step1” → “Step 1” and “Step2” → “Step 2”).
    • Standardized spacing and formatting in the upgrade instructions for clarity.
    • No changes to procedures, examples, or command snippets; content remains functionally identical for users following the steps.

1. Changed the format for consistency ("Step1" to "Step 1")
@drewazarias-dev drewazarias-dev requested a review from a team as a code owner October 1, 2025 01:09
@drewazarias-dev drewazarias-dev requested review from SecurityLife and removed request for a team October 1, 2025 01:09
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 1, 2025

Walkthrough

Minor typographical fixes in a documentation page’s section headings; no changes to content structure, steps, or code blocks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs typo fixes
docs/build-on-morph/developer-resources/node-operation/upgrade-node/2-upgrade-node-docker.md
Corrected headings: "Step1" → "Step 1" and "Step2" → "Step 2". No content or logic changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my whiskers, tap my paw—
Two steps now spaced, a tidy law.
No bytes were moved, no docks were spun,
Just cleaner trails beneath the sun.
Hop-hop, I stamp “Step 1, Step 2”—
A typographic rendezvous.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title “Update 2-upgrade-node-docker.md” is overly generic and only indicates that a file was updated without summarizing the substantive change (formatting corrections to step headings), so it does not clearly convey the main purpose of the pull request. Please revise the title to succinctly describe the actual change, for example “Fix spacing in step headings in 2-upgrade-node-docker.md” so that reviewers immediately understand the nature of the update.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/build-on-morph/developer-resources/node-operation/upgrade-node/2-upgrade-node-docker.md (1)

47-47: Update Step heading formatting across upgrade-node docs
The change in 2-upgrade-node-docker.md is correct, but 1-upgrade-node-host.md still has:

  • Line 10: ### Step1: Compile the new version of the code
  • Line 39: ### Step2: Stop nodes
  • Line 51: ### Step3: Restart

Please add a space after “Step” (e.g. “Step 1:”) for consistency.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9549a05 and a4ed932.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/build-on-morph/developer-resources/node-operation/upgrade-node/2-upgrade-node-docker.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/build-on-morph/developer-resources/node-operation/upgrade-node/2-upgrade-node-docker.md (1)

18-18: LGTM! Formatting improvement.

The space between "Step" and "1" improves readability and follows standard documentation conventions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant