Update 2-morph-modular-design.md

[drewazarias-dev]

1. Grammar change (“Sequencer network responsible” to “The Sequencer Network is responsible”)
2. Meta description typo change ("cost0efficient" to "cost-efficient)
3. Format change for consistency ("zk-proof" to "zk proof")

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected typos and improved wording for clarity (e.g., “cost-efficient,” added missing articles).
  • Standardized terminology (e.g., “zk proofs”).
  • Refined descriptions of the Sequencer network for readability.
  • Cleaned up end-of-section phrasing and formatting for consistency.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation edits in a single Markdown file correct typos, adjust wording for clarity, standardize terms (e.g., “zk proofs”), and normalize end-of-file text.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Docs wording and typo fixes docs/how-morph-works/2-morph-modular-design.md	Corrected typos, added definite article, adjusted phrasing (“zk-proofs” → “zk proofs”), and normalized end-of-file prose.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I twitch my ears at typos slight,
A dash, a hyphen—set just right.
From zk-proofs to zk proofs clean,
I nibble words between the lines unseen.
Thump! The docs now hop in tune—
Crisp as carrots under moon.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	⚠️ Warning	The title simply states that the markdown file was updated without conveying the nature of the changes, making it too generic and not summarizing the main edits such as typo fixes and wording improvements.	Consider revising the title to reflect the actual changes, for example “Fix typos and improve wording in 2-morph-modular-design.md” which clearly conveys the content and purpose of this update.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

docs/how-morph-works/2-morph-modular-design.md (3)

5-5: Tighten meta description (commas, brevity, capitalization).

Current phrasing mixes list punctuation and is a bit long. Suggest concise, SEO‑friendly copy and consistent “ZK rollup” style.

-description: Upgrade your blockchain experience with Morph - the secure decentralized, cost-efficient, and high-performing optimistic zk-rollup solution. Try it now!
+description: Upgrade your blockchain experience with Morph—the secure, decentralized, cost‑efficient, high‑performance optimistic ZK rollup. Try it now!

---

46-46: Clarify “zk proofs” phrasing and outcome; standardize capitalization.

Make the mechanism and benefit crisper and capitalize “ZK”.

-The [Rollup](../how-morph-works/general-protocol-design/1-rollup.md) process involves submitting Layer 2 transactions and states to Layer 1, ensuring data availability. Morph's rollup strategy maximizes efficiency by compressing block content using zk proofs, which helps manage the cost of Layer 1 data availability. 
+The [Rollup](../how-morph-works/general-protocol-design/1-rollup.md) process submits Layer 2 transactions and states to Layer 1 to ensure data availability. Morph’s rollup strategy improves efficiency by compressing block data and posting succinct ZK proofs, reducing Layer 1 data‑availability costs.

Optional: audit the file for “zk‑rollup” vs “ZK rollup” to keep terminology consistent.

---

110-110: Polish style/parallelism; keep role names consistent.

Tighten wording and align capitalization of components/roles.

-The components form the foundation of the various roles in Morph. For instance, running an L2 node allows one to become a Node, while adding batch submitter and consensus client functionalities enables the role of Sequencer. These roles collaborate to perform the core functions of Morph, creating a complete and efficient rollup solution.
+These components underpin the roles in Morph. For example, running an L2 node makes you a Node; adding the Batch Submitter and Consensus Client enables the Sequencer role. These roles work together to deliver Morph’s core functions, forming a complete and efficient rollup solution.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9549a05 and a86f56c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/how-morph-works/2-morph-modular-design.md (4 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/how-morph-works/2-morph-modular-design.md (1)

32-32: Consistently capitalize the component name, split sentences, avoid “&”, and correct the link path.

-The Sequencer network is responsible for the execution & consensus of the Layer 2 transactions, for more details please refer to Morph's [decentralized sequencers](../how-morph-works/decentralized-sequencers/morph-decentralized-sequencer-network).
+The Sequencer Network is responsible for Layer 2 execution and consensus. For details, see [Morph’s Decentralized Sequencer Network](../how-morph-works/decentralized-sequencers/1-morph-decentralized-sequencer-network.md).

Please verify the updated relative link resolves correctly in the built docs.