Skip to content

Be more explicit about licenses #878

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 16, 2022

Conversation

robsdedude
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@AndyHeap-NeoTech AndyHeap-NeoTech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks great. Would it be worth commenting/highlighting the changes that have been made and why they were necessary? Just so people understand the reason for the code snippets being present in the way they are.

@robsdedude
Copy link
Member Author

The comments for the respective code snippets already mention what was changed. Would you like those comments to elaborate a little more?

@AndyHeap-NeoTech
Copy link
Contributor

Me having a brain failure. Had a reread. All is good!

@robsdedude robsdedude merged commit 9cfa4c8 into neo4j:5.0 Dec 16, 2022
@robsdedude robsdedude deleted the more-explicit-licensing branch December 16, 2022 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants