-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
feat: expose generatedFunctions
to consumers
#6525
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7e3634a
feat: expose `generatedFunctions` to consumers
eduardoboucas 1deca39
fix: add guard
eduardoboucas 946a271
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expose-generated-functions
eduardoboucas 900caf9
Merge branch 'main' into feat/expose-generated-functions
serhalp File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ | ||
type GeneratorType = 'build plugin' | 'extension' | ||
|
||
export interface GeneratedFunction { | ||
generator: { | ||
displayName: string | ||
name: string | ||
type: GeneratorType | ||
} | ||
path: string | ||
} | ||
|
||
export interface ReturnValue { | ||
displayName?: string | ||
generatedFunctions?: { path: string }[] | ||
generatorType: GeneratorType | ||
} | ||
|
||
export const getGeneratedFunctions = (returnValues?: Record<string, ReturnValue>): GeneratedFunction[] => { | ||
return Object.entries(returnValues ?? {}).flatMap(([name, returnValue]) => { | ||
const generator = { | ||
displayName: returnValue.displayName ?? name, | ||
name, | ||
type: returnValue.generatorType, | ||
} | ||
|
||
return ( | ||
returnValue.generatedFunctions?.map((func) => ({ | ||
generator, | ||
path: func.path, | ||
})) ?? [] | ||
) | ||
}) | ||
} |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW this is because given
f: Record<string, Foo>
withnoUncheckedIndexAccess
disabled,f[string]
results in the typeFoo
, notFoo | undefined
. ESLint is being pedantically correct here (arguably).You can avoid the suppression this way:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But that's not the type I want to return. I don't want consumers of this method to think that some keys will have the value
undefined
, because that shouldn't be the case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's problematic either way. It's just a limitation of TypeScript's type system without
noUncheckedIndexAccess
:result['kjfandsakj']
will getGeneratedFunction[]
.result
's own keys and dereferencingresult[key]
will getGeneratedFunction[] | undefined
.Both cases are not what we intend to express 😞. The latter is safer, but way more annoying.
https://claude.ai/share/a8fbb3cb-bd72-4761-a2e6-1d55e876889c
The only good solution is enabling
noUncheckedIndexAccess
.(To be clear, this is absolutely nonblocking tangential rambling—please proceed with merging!)