-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 934
Upgrade to ReLinq 2.2.0 #696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
4908c00
to
11be64b
Compare
11be64b
to
b9f22dc
Compare
Removing |
Something else broken. |
Without implementing the
|
49621b0
to
ba9749e
Compare
ba9749e
to
42b5c27
Compare
To support VS2017 project for the VB project, a workaround was in place until Remotion.Linq was updated.
42b5c27
to
427fb1f
Compare
This is ready for review now. Both NHibernate was directly accessing the |
Assigned to 5.2 because upgrading reference required to release a minor version. |
@ngbrown @hazzik Is it normal that a minor version update of ReLinq needs code changes in NHibernate? If yes, shouldn't the version contraint of the NuGet package be changed to "< 2.3.0"? With 5.0.x and 5.1.x we now already have the situation that users of NHibernate that use the "old" style packages.config (so nearly everyone that doesn't target .NET Standard or .NET Core) are offered updates to ReLinq 2.2.0. So maybe it would also make sense to update the version constraint for the next patch releases of that versions to "< 2.2.0"? |
Sometimes a minor version introduces new features which do not play well with old code emulating it for previous versions. Maybe it is this is the case with the Ideally it should not happen. We cannot predict whether this will happen again or not, be it with ReLinq or another dependency. So better stick to SemVer. |
This should finish up NH-3990, sorry to continue to linger on that issue...
The issue was resolved on the Remotion.Linq project side by RMLNQ-115.