Skip to content

Conversation

ErickWendel
Copy link
Member

Backport of #41862

/cc @danielleadams

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Apr 19, 2022
@danielleadams danielleadams added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Apr 20, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @danielleadams. Please 👍 to approve.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ErickWendel
Copy link
Member Author

is anything missing to approve on this PR?

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

@nodejs/collaborators would anyone else be able to review this?

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@danielleadams
Copy link
Contributor

@ErickWendel I just realized the base of this PR is pointed to main. Can you point it to v16.x-staging and then resolve the merge conflicts? Thank you!

@ErickWendel
Copy link
Member Author

@ErickWendel I just realized the base of this PR is pointed to main. Can you point it to v16.x-staging and then resolve the merge conflicts? Thank you!

Oh. I'm sorry about it. I'll do. This week is being crazy here but I'll trying doing it by the weekend

@ErickWendel
Copy link
Member Author

hey just a heads up. I'm back from vacations so I'll be working on this feature this week o/

@ErickWendel ErickWendel force-pushed the erick/backport-streams-improve-code-coverage branch from 7fd01a6 to 9bd0c30 Compare July 5, 2022 20:12
@ErickWendel ErickWendel changed the base branch from main to v16.x-staging July 5, 2022 20:12
@ErickWendel ErickWendel closed this Jul 5, 2022
@ErickWendel ErickWendel deleted the erick/backport-streams-improve-code-coverage branch July 5, 2022 20:15
@ErickWendel ErickWendel restored the erick/backport-streams-improve-code-coverage branch July 5, 2022 20:15
@ErickWendel ErickWendel reopened this Jul 5, 2022
@ErickWendel ErickWendel force-pushed the erick/backport-streams-improve-code-coverage branch from 9bd0c30 to 5bedc83 Compare July 5, 2022 20:25
@ErickWendel
Copy link
Member Author

Ready to go now 🤩

@Trott Trott force-pushed the erick/backport-streams-improve-code-coverage branch from 5bedc83 to e8d4384 Compare July 8, 2022 15:59
@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jul 12, 2022

Thank you @ErickWendel. Landed in 4aa4f7c

@targos targos closed this Jul 12, 2022
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 12, 2022
PR-URL: #41862
Backport-PR-URL: #42788
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2022
PR-URL: #41862
Backport-PR-URL: #42788
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
guangwong pushed a commit to noslate-project/node that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2022
PR-URL: nodejs/node#41862
Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#42788
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Juan José Arboleda <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants