Skip to content

lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time #51447

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024
Merged

lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time #51447

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build time and always false.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module. labels Jan 13, 2024
@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 13, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 13, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/56765/

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Jan 13, 2024

Can you add a test ?

anonrig
anonrig reviewed Jan 13, 2024
View reviewed changes
legendecas
legendecas reviewed Jan 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 16, 2024
targos
targos previously requested changes Jan 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@targos targos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test ?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 16, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/56811/

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jan 22, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/56876/

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

Can you add a test ?

@targos I don't think we can reliably test this because this requires accessing something that we are not supposed to access in the snapshot i.e. before the test is run.

@targos targos dismissed their stale review February 1, 2024 13:06

addressed

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57022/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57028/

@joyeecheung
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
3160cfe 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57144/

MrJithil
MrJithil reviewed Feb 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
lib/internal/fs/utils.js
function emitRecursiveRmdirWarning() {
if (recursiveRmdirWarned === undefined) {
// TODO(joyeecheung): use getOptionValue('--no-deprecation') instead.
recursiveRmdirWarned = process.noDeprecation;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

recursiveRmdirWarned = recursiveRmdirWarned || process.noDeprecation;

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that would make the code harder to understand when we are lazily initializing a boolean.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57159/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57193/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57210/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57227/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57229/

@legendecas
Copy link
Member

#51813 failed across multiple PRs.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57256/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57271/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57280/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57281/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57291/

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 22, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57314/

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 25, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Feb 25, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57416/

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/57421/

@legendecas legendecas added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Feb 26, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Feb 26, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 9ac98b1 into nodejs:main Feb 26, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 9ac98b1

marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
@joyeecheung @marco-ippolito
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
70fc7de 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.

PR-URL: #51447
Reviewed-By: Jithil P Ponnan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
@joyeecheung @marco-ippolito
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
ecabf88 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.

PR-URL: #51447
Reviewed-By: Jithil P Ponnan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
@joyeecheung @marco-ippolito
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
eb1089a 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.

PR-URL: #51447
Reviewed-By: Jithil P Ponnan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito mentioned this pull request Mar 1, 2024
Merged
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
@joyeecheung @richardlau
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
520b504 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.

PR-URL: #51447
Reviewed-By: Jithil P Ponnan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
richardlau pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
@joyeecheung @richardlau
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
9082cc5 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.

PR-URL: #51447
Reviewed-By: Jithil P Ponnan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
@richardlau richardlau mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Merged
rdw-msft pushed a commit to rdw-msft/node that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2024
@joyeecheung @rdw-msft
lib: do not access process.noDeprecation at build time
9fabb31 
Delay access at run time otherwise the value is captured at build
time and always false.

PR-URL: nodejs#51447
Reviewed-By: Jithil P Ponnan <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anonrig anonrig anonrig left review comments

@MrJithil MrJithil MrJithil approved these changes

@benjamingr benjamingr benjamingr approved these changes

@lpinca lpinca lpinca approved these changes

@legendecas legendecas legendecas approved these changes

@aduh95 aduh95 aduh95 approved these changes

@targos targos targos left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fs Issues and PRs related to the fs subsystem / file system. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. util Issues and PRs related to the built-in util module.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@joyeecheung @nodejs-github-bot @targos @legendecas @benjamingr @lpinca @anonrig @aduh95 @MrJithil