Skip to content

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Feb 9, 2016

I did not touch SetWeak and SetAccessor yet (will need help for those).

Ref: #4869

cc @nodejs/v8

@targos targos added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency. labels Feb 9, 2016
@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

LGTM with style suggestions. Good work.

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Feb 10, 2016

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/1625/

Should I squash everything into one commit (and list the changes in the message) before landing ?

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

Whatever you prefer. I'd be okay with keeping the commits separate, might be easier if we need to bisect.

targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
PR-URL: #5159
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <[email protected]>
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
targos added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2016
ofrobots pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2016
@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

To confirm, is this safe to land in v5.x? (Please reply in #5559)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. v8 engine Issues and PRs related to the V8 dependency.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants