Remove English commented out code from translations

[XhmikosR]

It seems it's common practice. We need another way for translators to follow the English files and know up to where they have translated. Maybe a simple HTML comment with the hash and then they can compare after that and see the diff.

Right now, many translations follow this practice which results in ~2x lines. All this does not come for free and it's bloating the codebase IMO.

Also, there's #2450.

[grodd]

Hey! Can you tell me more about this issue?

[nschonni]

EX: English text is copied into the translated documents like

https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org/blame/347682b75702a51d515b307aabd1e4766df55978/locale/ko/about/index.md#L9-L18

So if the English is updated, these are actually out of sync.

[SEWeiTung]

@XhmikosR and @nschonni, I know this so far, it seems this is Korean and Japanese's habit. So we don't need to worry about them.
But in order to be fair, I'd invite @nodejs/nodejs-ko and @nodejs/nodejs-ja to have a discussion about it. If they don't agree with your ideas, I have to close your issue.

[yous]

Commenting the corresponding commit hash of English file may work. But transition will take time as it requires re-sync of all translation files. I personally don't have objections to having process transition. But I have to listen how @nodejs/nodejs-ko think.

[XhmikosR]

It's also a habit in pt_BR, at least in some files.

[alexandrtovmach]

We decided to go with CrowdIn approach here nodejs/i18n#72 and I'm now working on configuring it, so this issue will be fixed in near future.

[XhmikosR]

@nschonni I haven't followed the translations on his repo so if this is sorted or if it will be sorted, feel free to close this issue.

[nschonni]

Crowdin is hooked up now, but it's not really used. Primarily the changes comes as PRs to the repo

[ovflowd]

Closing this as the next.js migration removed the commented out english sources.