Update MCA mutexes to use the qthreads ULT backend

[janciesko]

• This replaces the use of opal atomics with the use of qthread's atomics in the opal/thread MCA if ompi is configured with qthreads.
• This resolves the deadlock reported originating from expecting recursive locks to work (List of issues with OMPI master+ULT+PartCom #10459).
• Requires Qthreads version >=1.18 as we added support for recursive locks in that version. I will issue a PR for the configury changes to version check.

Signed-off-by: Jan Ciesko [email protected]

[ompiteam-bot]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[gpaulsen]

ok to test

[gpaulsen]

@janciesko Would you be able to rebase your branch on main somewhere after
7dbfbeea - build: Use open-mpi/oac for oac submodule commit? We're having an issue with the IBM CI when it tries to test a Pull Request that doesn't include that commit.

[jsquyres]

@janciesko And be sure to see https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg21421.html

[gpaulsen]

bot:ibm:retest

[janciesko]

@gpaulsen, rebased.

[jsquyres]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[jsquyres]

../../opal/mca/threads/pthreads/threads_pthreads_mutex.h: In function 'opal_thread_internal_mutex_lock':
../../opal/mca/threads/pthreads/threads_pthreads_mutex.h:113:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'opal_show_help' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
         opal_show_help("help-opal-threads.txt", "mutex lock failed", true);

You need to #include "opal/util/show_help.h".

[janciesko]

I think we do have that:

ompi/opal/mca/threads/argobots/threads_argobots_mutex.h

Line 43 in 65e6591

#include "opal/util/show_help.h"

Is the from the Mellanox CI?
Missing for pthreads. Updating.

[janciesko]

Added missing include.

[jsquyres]

bot:aws:retest

[bwbarrett]

bot:aws:retest

[bwbarrett]

The failure from the Pull Request Build Checker is real, but caused by a bad commit to the main branch. If you push a rebase on top of main, it should go away.

[janciesko]

Rebased to today's main. Thanks @bwbarrett.

[awlauria]

is this good to go or waiting on something?

[janciesko]

LGTM