Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Powerpc atomics: Force usage of powerpc assembly. #8649
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Powerpc atomics: Force usage of powerpc assembly. #8649
Changes from all commits
e3f3c5b
136213d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just verifying that this is correct. PPC is PowerPC which is derived from Power. Is it correct to use PPC here or should it be Power?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah this is a good point. I'm not sure @jjhursey @gpaulsen ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The check was added under this architecture string:
So maybe 'power' would be more generic, though it does make for a slightly misleading configure name. (
--enable-builtin-atomics-for-power
does that mean power-aware or powerful or Power arch). So if we move to the 'power' then I would make the option--enable-builtin-atomics-for-power-arch
.That being said, I don't really have a preference on the naming here. Anything that is clear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fine with either. I feel like we use the term interchangeably, so I'm not sure tbh.