-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 900
osc/rdma, btl/tcp: fix various issues with osc/rdma #9400
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
wzamazon
wants to merge
9
commits into
open-mpi:master
from
wzamazon:osc_rdma_single_channel_shared_comm
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
09f8f75
btl/base,ofi: adjust the MCA_BTL_ATOMIC_SUPPORTS_GLOB flag
wzamazon c8495bd
osc/rdma: fix bugs in evaluating using_cpu_atomics was
wzamazon 131bb67
osc/rdma: fix the fail condition in osc_rdma_new_peer()
wzamazon 4a845a9
osc/rdma: do not use local leader optimization for active message RDMA
wzamazon 3c0ae03
osc/rdma: add pid to shm file name
wzamazon 6c4cb75
osc/rdma: use pointer to btl to replace btl_index in peer
wzamazon b0197d9
osc/rdma: use btl/self for self communication as last resort
wzamazon ef501d8
btl/self: claim support of MCA_BTL_ATOMIC_SUPPORTS_GLOB
wzamazon 5d9e5a2
osc/rdma: adjust the way use_cpu_atomics is evaluated
wzamazon File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure this is the right solution to the problem. The problem with the local leader optimization is that it assume ordering that AM doesn't give, but it's unclear to me that the entire implementation of OSC RDMA can deal with the AM ordering guarantees. I think we need to step back and answer the ordering guarantees question before adding this complexity.