Skip to content

v5.0.x: fortran MPI_Waitall array_of_requests etc to dimension(*) #9608

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

markalle
Copy link
Contributor

@markalle markalle commented Oct 28, 2021

Looking at the 3rd language binding for each MPI function, eg
the fortran "USE mpi" or "INCLUDE ’mpif.h’" binding, I looked
at the various lines that had "dimension" and "array_of_...".
There were several things like MPI_Waitall where I changed

  • integer, dimension(count), intent(inout) :: array_of_requests
  • integer, dimension(*), intent(inout) :: array_of_requests
    and maybe one array_of_statuses for a spawn call

Signed-off-by: Mark Allen [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 121bbe5)

#9566 for v5.0.x

Refs #9484

@awlauria awlauria added this to the v5.0.0 milestone Nov 2, 2021
@awlauria
Copy link
Contributor

awlauria commented Nov 2, 2021

@markalle looks there there are some conflicts now... :(

Looking at the 3rd language binding for each MPI function, eg
the fortran "USE mpi" or "INCLUDE ’mpif.h’" binding, I looked
at the various lines that had "dimension" and "array_of_...".
There were several things like MPI_Waitall where I changed
-  integer, dimension(count), intent(inout) :: array_of_requests
+  integer, dimension(*), intent(inout) :: array_of_requests
and maybe one array_of_statuses for a spawn call

Signed-off-by: Mark Allen <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 121bbe5)
@jsquyres jsquyres changed the title fortran MPI_Waitall array_of_requests etc to dimension(*) v5.0.x: fortran MPI_Waitall array_of_requests etc to dimension(*) Nov 8, 2021
@gpaulsen gpaulsen merged commit 6a0bca6 into open-mpi:v5.0.x Nov 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants