WIP: Adding requestBodies transform support

[radist2s]

According to OpenAPI 3.0 components.requestBodies have a specific schema:

components:
  requestBodies:
    PetBody:
      description: A JSON object containing pet information
      required: true
      content:
        application/json:
          schema:
            $ref: '#/components/schemas/Pet'

Currently components.requestBodies is transformed as normal schema with the wrong output code:

  requestBodies: {
    /** List of user object */
    UserArray: { [key: string]: any };
    /** Pet object that needs to be added to the store */
    Pet: { [key: string]: any };
  };

This PR fix wrong transformation, and makes ability to have a valid output code:

  requestBodies: {
    /** List of user object */
    UserArray: {
      content: {
        "application/json": components["schemas"]["User"][];
      };
    };
    /** Pet object that needs to be added to the store */
    Pet: {
      content: {
        "application/json": components["schemas"]["Pet"];
        "application/xml": components["schemas"]["Pet"];
      };
    };
  };

[radist2s]

Ok, at least tested all suits, I had timeout issue on my side. WIP

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #474 (7fb007d) into main (026eb74) will decrease coverage by 14.00%.
The diff coverage is 78.13%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #474       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   93.81%   79.80%   -14.01%     
===========================================
  Files           5        9        +4     
  Lines         291      312       +21     
  Branches       97       96        -1     
===========================================
- Hits          273      249       -24     
- Misses         16       63       +47     
+ Partials        2        0        -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/transform/index.ts	26.92% <26.92%> (ø)
src/transform/headers.ts	30.00% <30.00%> (ø)
src/transform/responses.ts	86.84% <86.84%> (ø)
src/transform/paths.ts	91.66% <91.66%> (ø)
src/transform/operation.ts	96.42% <96.42%> (ø)
src/transform/schema.ts	98.27% <98.27%> (ø)
src/index.ts	76.47% <100.00%> (-5.35%)	⬇️
src/transform/parameters.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/utils.ts	91.22% <100.00%> (-6.96%)	⬇️
... and 6 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d5e2b28...7fb007d. Read the comment docs.

[radist2s]

@drwpow, what is needed to pass the Codecov test? I tried to open report on Codecov, but have got the error message: "Missing base report".

[drwpow]

This looks good! Thanks for adding.

[drwpow]

You probably remember the previous versions of the test. Here’s some extra context for why it‘s not in the unit tests now.

Prettier saves a lot of code managing indents, quotation style, etc. By just running Prettier at the end, this library can do less formatting, and only has to render valid (albeit messy) TypeScript. But recently I noticed that this library wasn’t generating syntax correctly in places, and Prettier sometimes would format incorrectly. So I wanted to write more tests without Prettier to make sure the generated code was valid TS, and Prettier wasn’t hiding any issues. But that comes with drawbacks, obviously—it’s annoying to write & test unformatted code.

Anyway, I’m fine having Prettier in some tests, and it’s fine here! But in most places it’s been intentionally left out.

[drwpow]

Nice test!

[drwpow]

@drwpow, what is needed to pass the Codecov test? I tried to open report on Codecov, but have got the error message: "Missing base report".

Just fixed that problem now. Sorry about that. This looks good! Thank you.

[drwpow]

@all-contributors please add @radist2s for code, test

[allcontributors]

@drwpow

I've put up a pull request to add @radist2s! 🎉