MOD: close subprocess and its file handles when reset

[coderfengyun]

Describe the changes you have made:

Problem I encountered: When I use the same Interpreter instance to complete multiple code-writing tasks in a row within a process, I try to use Interpreter.reset() to reset the context and Interpreter state between each task. However, after several runs, I ran into the problem of too many open file handles.

Solution I provide: So in this pr, Interpreter.reset closes the child process and closes its open file handles.

Reference any relevant issue (Fixes #000)

• I have performed a self-review of my code:

I have tested the code on the following OS:

• Windows
• MacOS
• Linux

AI Language Model (if applicable)

• GPT4
• GPT3
• Llama 7B
• Llama 13B
• Llama 34B
• Huggingface model (Please specify which one)

[AncalagonX]

Would this also be desired for %undo if there were new handle openings that were undone?

[coderfengyun]

Would this also be desired for %undo if there were new handle openings that were undone?

I think if the code-interpreter subprocess is already started before %undo, whether to shut down this child process or not, depending on preferences for code.

1. Pros: clearing has the obvious benefit of releasing the file handle ASAP. In this case, The question is equivalent to whether or not to reset the code-interpreter every time a single question in a chat is answered.
2. Cons: not clearing speeds up the processing of the follow-up question in this chat session, and the file handle is eventually released when the chat session is closed or reset.

I would suggest a Chat session as a management unit to prevent certain context failures. But, eventually a decision needs to be made by the owner of this code repository.

[ericrallen]

I think these changes probably need to move to interpreter/code_interpreters/subprocess_code_interpreter.py now that the code has been refactored.

[coderfengyun]

Of course, I'll come back to modify this commit.

[coderfengyun]

What do you think about turning off stdin and stdout directly in the terminate method?

[ericrallen]

I think this needs to move to interpreter/core/core.py now that the codebase has been refactored.

[ericrallen]

Hey there, @coderfengyun!

I think this is a really great suggestion and am happy to help resolve the merge conflicts and move the code to the refactored codebase if you want to hand it off.

I think we just need to add the stdin and stdout calls to .close() to the existing terminate() handler.

[coderfengyun]

Hey there, @coderfengyun!

I think this is a really great suggestion and am happy to help resolve the merge conflicts and move the code to the refactored codebase if you want to hand it off.

I think we just need to add the stdin and stdout calls to .close() to the existing terminate() handler.

Changes were made as per your REVIEW comments. @ericrallen @AncalagonX

[KillianLucas]

Great work @coderfengyun, very straightforward and helpful! Merging now, then renaming .proc to .process which is I believe the right property name.

Long time coming and I very much appreciate your edits post-refactor. Thank you @ericrallen for your work here too.

[coderfengyun]

Thanks to all the contributors to open-interpreter for giving us the opportunity to explore the use of code-interpreter. What I did was make a modest contribution.