8338474: Parallel: Deprecate and obsolete PSChunkLargeArrays

[albertnetymk]

Deprecating PSChunkLargeArrays, which is used only by Parallel and it is enabled by default.

Disabling it offers little benefit, so removing it do reduce the number of commandline flags.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change requires CSR request JDK-8360628 to be approved

Issues

• JDK-8338474: Parallel: Deprecate and obsolete PSChunkLargeArrays (Enhancement - P4)
• JDK-8360628: Parallel: Deprecate and obsolete PSChunkLargeArrays (CSR)

Reviewers

• Thomas Schatzl (@tschatzl - Reviewer)
• Kim Barrett (@kimbarrett - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25997/head:pull/25997
$ git checkout pull/25997

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25997
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25997/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25997

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25997

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25997.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back ayang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8338474: Parallel: Deprecate and obsolete PSChunkLargeArrays

Reviewed-by: tschatzl, kbarrett

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 64 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3066a67: 8361101: AOTCodeAddressTable::_stubs_addr not initialized/freed properly
• ce99869: 8359120: Improve warning message when fail to load hsdis library
• eac8f5d: 8325478: Restructure the macro expansion compiler phase to not include macro elimination
• ... and 61 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5a1301df19553c7ba04c746b4002164f3b833e70...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (61ceec87)

[albertnetymk]

/cc hotspot-gc

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk
The hotspot-gc label was successfully added.

[kimbarrett]

Looks good.

[albertnetymk]

Thanks for review.

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 832bfbc.
Since your change was applied there have been 64 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3066a67: 8361101: AOTCodeAddressTable::_stubs_addr not initialized/freed properly
• ce99869: 8359120: Improve warning message when fail to load hsdis library
• eac8f5d: 8325478: Restructure the macro expansion compiler phase to not include macro elimination
• ... and 61 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/5a1301df19553c7ba04c746b4002164f3b833e70...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@albertnetymk Pushed as commit 832bfbc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.