Skip to content

Conversation

RealFYang
Copy link
Member

@RealFYang RealFYang commented Sep 23, 2025

Hi, please consider this small change fixing setting of AlignVector flag on RISC-V.

According to the latest RISC-V linux hardware probing syscall [1], the performance of misaligned memory accesses
has been divided into two cases: RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_PERF and RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF
for scalar and vector respectively. And RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 is now deprecated and it returns similar values
to RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_SCALAR_PERF.

Previously, we use RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_CPUPERF_0 to detect support for misaligned memory accesses and reflect the result
on these VM flags: AvoidUnalignedAccesses, UseUnalignedAccesses and AlignVector. But it doesn't seem correct to update
AlignVector according to this value. And this is causing issues on RISC-V hardwares which have fast misaligned accesses only
for the scalar case. I witnessed SIGBUG error on these hardwares when doing vector misaligned accesses.

So we should align AlignVector with RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF instead. This patch just reverts the previous
setting of AlignVector and just let it have the default value which is true. I will try to add detection in a separate PR
for RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_MISALIGNED_VECTOR_PERF and update AlignVector accordingly.

[1] https://docs.kernel.org/arch/riscv/hwprobe.html


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8368366: RISC-V: AlignVector is mistakenly set to AvoidUnalignedAccesses (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27445/head:pull/27445
$ git checkout pull/27445

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27445
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27445/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27445

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27445

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27445.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back fyang! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2025

@RealFYang This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8368366: RISC-V: AlignVector is mistakenly set to AvoidUnalignedAccesses

Reviewed-by: fjiang, rehn, mli

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 30 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 23, 2025

@RealFYang The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 23, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 23, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@feilongjiang feilongjiang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for finding this!

Copy link
Contributor

@robehn robehn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, thanks, I think you are on the right track.

But an additional thing: if user sets "-XX:-UseUnalignedAccesses" I think that should be enought to stop all of them all. Also I'm doubt ful of the usefulness of Avoid flag.
I don't see any case where I would have Avoid = false but also UseUnAl= false.
Right now I always use Avoid = !UseUnal.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 23, 2025
@RealFYang
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, thanks, I think you are on the right track.

Thanks for confirming that.

But an additional thing: if user sets "-XX:-UseUnalignedAccesses" I think that should be enought to stop all of them all. Also I'm doubt ful of the usefulness of Avoid flag. I don't see any case where I would have Avoid = false but also UseUnAl= false. Right now I always use Avoid = !UseUnal.

And I use it the same way as you do. AvoidUnalignedAccesses is derived from the aarch64 counterpart. I guess maybe it's time to let it go.

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member Author

FYI: My local hotspot_vector_1 hotspot_vector_2 jdk_vector jdk_vector_sanity compiler/vectorization compiler/vectorapi test result with fastdebug build is clean. And I used qemu-system running kernel 6.14.

Copy link

@Hamlin-Li Hamlin-Li left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks.

@RealFYang
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks all for the reviews.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2025

Going to push as commit 2313f8e.
Since your change was applied there have been 30 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 24, 2025

@RealFYang Pushed as commit 2313f8e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants