Skip to content

8342075: HttpClient: improve HTTP/2 flow control checks #3786

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Jul 29, 2025

I backport this for parity with 17.0.17-oracle based on the change in 21.

src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/Stream.java
Two trivial resolves due to context.

src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/WindowUpdateSender.java

Resolved because 8308310: HttpClient: Avoid logging or locking from within synchronized blocks
is not in 17.

src/java.net.http/share/classes/module-info.java
Omitted, as "8296804: Document HttpClient configuration properties in java.net.http module-info"
is not in 17. The CSR for 17 documents that this is dropped.

Follow ups are on the list of backports I will do.
Blocking changes all already in 17.

I had to adapt ConnectionFlowControlTest.java and StreamFlowControlTest.java because HttpClient does not
implement AutoClosable / shutdownNow() / close() in 17.
I also amended the @build instructions in StreamFlowControlTest.java.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • JDK-8342075 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8351085 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8342075: HttpClient: improve HTTP/2 flow control checks (Bug - P4 - Requested)
  • JDK-8351085: HttpClient: improve HTTP/2 flow control checks (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3786/head:pull/3786
$ git checkout pull/3786

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3786
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev.git pull/3786/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3786

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3786

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk17u-dev/pull/3786.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 29, 2025

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 29, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@GoeLin GoeLin changed the base branch from master to pr/3783 July 29, 2025 11:03
@GoeLin GoeLin changed the title Goetz backport 8342075 Backport 32ac3e713ea4370e496717967fff7de9450d2f69 Jul 29, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 32ac3e713ea4370e496717967fff7de9450d2f69 8342075: HttpClient: improve HTTP/2 flow control checks Jul 29, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 29, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Jul 29, 2025
@GoeLin GoeLin changed the base branch from pr/3783 to master August 1, 2025 13:18
@GoeLin GoeLin marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2025 13:26
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link

@alexeybakhtin alexeybakhtin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the backport! The changes look good to me

@GoeLin GoeLin force-pushed the goetz_backport_8342075 branch from 3349b52 to c86d9d2 Compare August 5, 2025 09:40
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2025

@GoeLin Please do not rebase or force-push to an active PR as it invalidates existing review comments. Note for future reference, the bots always squash all changes into a single commit automatically as part of the integration. See OpenJDK Developers’ Guide for more information.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Aug 6, 2025

HI @alexeybakhtin
I saw in #3298 that you are using a ThreadPool in the tests.
I think this is a useful improvement. Should I add that to my change here?

@alexeybakhtin
Copy link

HI @alexeybakhtin I saw in #3298 that you are using a ThreadPool in the tests. I think this is a useful improvement. Should I add that to my change here?

Yes, I forgot about these changes. I think they could be useful here to clean up resources.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Aug 7, 2025

Thanks, I added them.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Aug 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@schmelter-sap schmelter-sap left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 14, 2025

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Aug 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants