-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 567
MON-4031: Add prometheusOperatorConfig API #2481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
marioferh
wants to merge
3
commits into
openshift:master
Choose a base branch
from
marioferh:prometheus_operator_config_api
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How does this configuration relate to the configuration proposed in #2463?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is Prometheus Operator, the other one is Prometheus config. Of course they are related but they have different configs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the Prometheus config used by the PrometheusOperator?
Would it make sense to co-locate the configurations under a top-level
prometheus
field?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not directly . Prometheus Config is use by Prometheus. PrometheusOperator manages Prometheus instances, a
Alertmanagare, etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So what configures the Prometheus instances created by the Prometheus Operator to use the Prometheus Config?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's CMO, not PrometheusOperator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What will the CMO do with the PrometheusK8sConfig?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CMO takes PrometheusK8sConfing configmap and create a CR.
PrometheosOperator takes that CR and configure Prometheus.
I can understand your idea but PrometheusOperator manages all these components and I it's not a good idea to have all fields inside PrometheusOperator.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So to make sure I am following along, the CMO will:
PrometheusOperatorConfig
Prometheus
CRs using the configurations provided inPrometheusK8sConfig
. Does this apply to all Prometheus CRs?While these are two distinct things, they are both inherently related to how the CMO handles prometheus configuration on the cluster.
I'm not suggesting that we put all the fields under
PrometheusOperatorConfig
, I'm suggesting we use a shared parent field namedprometheus
that can have sibling fields for configuring the Prometheus Operator itself and, separately, configuring the individual Prometheus instance configurations. This way, if you want to add additional configuration options related to prometheus in the future, you don't have to add anotherPrometheus*
field.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct
But they are different things, the are related but from my point of view and how CMO works it makes no sense.
https://github.com/prometheus-operator/prometheus-operator
https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus
@danielmellado @simonpasquier any thoughts?