Skip to content

Conversation

DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor

@DavidHurta DavidHurta commented Sep 25, 2025

Per the integration guide for OTE, each test must have a clearly defined owner (by using a [Jira:Component] tag) or an entry in the ci-test-mapping repository. Naming the owner as "Cluster Version Operator" with spaces, as this is the format used to distinguish our component in the mapping repository [1].

Renaming tests should not be done without a proper setup, as this can lose a test's history. However, this test was never executed, and it acts as a signal of the OTE integration.

Per the integration guide for OTE, each test must have a clearly defined
owner (by using a [Jira:Component] tag) or an entry in the
ci-test-mapping repository. Naming the owner as
"Cluster Version Operator" with spaces, as this is the format used to
distinguish our component in the mapping repository [1].

Renaming tests should not be done without a proper setup, as this can
lose a test's history. However, this test was never executed, and it
acts as a signal of the OTE integration.

[1]: https://github.com/openshift-eng/ci-test-mapping/blob/b2ca5844ead12ede1cb72cae34321f3215beb6e3/pkg/components/clusterversionoperator/component.go#L14
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 25, 2025

@DavidHurta: This pull request references OTA-1585 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Per the integration guide for OTE, each test must have a clearly defined owner (by using a [Jira:Component] tag) or an entry in the ci-test-mapping repository. Naming the owner as "Cluster Version Operator" with spaces, as this is the format used to distinguish our component in the mapping repository [1].

Renaming tests should not be done without a proper setup, as this can lose a test's history. However, this test was never executed, and it acts as a signal of the OTE integration.

[!NOTE]
The verify-update job is expected to fail due to the renaming.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 25, 2025
@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor Author

The verify-update job is working as expected.

Missing Tests:
  * [cvo-testing] cluster-version-operator-tests should support passing tests
Error: missing tests, if you've renamed tests you must add their names to OriginalName, or mark them obsolete

And it has reminded me that I have forgotten to update the tests metadata file.

Such changes should not be done manually after the extension is
integrated!

Renaming tests should not be done without a proper setup, as this can
lose a test's history. However, this test was never executed, and it
acts as a signal of the OTE integration.

Doing this change manually to not unnecessarily clutter the code with
setting the original name of a test, which was never executed.
@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor Author

DavidHurta commented Sep 25, 2025

/hold WIP changes.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 26, 2025

@DavidHurta: This pull request references OTA-1585 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Per the integration guide for OTE, each test must have a clearly defined owner (by using a [Jira:Component] tag) or an entry in the ci-test-mapping repository. Naming the owner as "Cluster Version Operator" with spaces, as this is the format used to distinguish our component in the mapping repository [1].

Renaming tests should not be done without a proper setup, as this can lose a test's history. However, this test was never executed, and it acts as a signal of the OTE integration.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2025

@DavidHurta: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn cfab71d link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 26, 2025
Copy link
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 29, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidHurta, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified bypass

Renaming a test. The test is not executed anywhere.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@DavidHurta: The verified label has been added.

In response to this:

/verified bypass

Renaming a test. The test is not executed anywhere.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit ad57230 into openshift:main Sep 29, 2025
15 of 16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants