[release-4.18] CNTRLPLANE-1610: Backport StreamingCollectionEncoding for JSON and protobuf

[rh-roman]

Due to significant customer need for performance improvements related to API server pressure from large LIST requests, backporting the API streaming features that have been introduced in 1.33/1.34 related to kubernetes/enhancements#3157

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rh-roman: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 0567240|Implement chunking for gzip encoder in deferredResponseWriter: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 42823de|Implement tests for encoding collections in Proto: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 5f5f33f|Implement streaming proto encoding: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 7506505|Add tests for encoding collections in JSON for KEP-5116: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• 7bffc85|Streaming JSON encoder for List: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• b7856ba|Add a test to validate deferredResponseWriteron multiple write calls: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message
• b7b7574|Switch test to gofuzz: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rh-roman
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bertinatto for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

Hi @rh-roman. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[benluddy]

/retitle [release-4.18] Backport StreamingCollectionEncoding for JSON and protobuf

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rh-roman: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

• 64d5177|UPSTREAM: 130220: Add tests for encoding collections in JSON for KEP-5116: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130220 has merged
• 7ef9043|UPSTREAM: 129334: Streaming JSON encoder for List: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#129334 has merged
• baf6e11|UPSTREAM: 130511: Implement tests for encoding collections in Proto: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130511 has merged
• c1ee94b|UPSTREAM: 129407: Implement streaming proto encoding: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#129407 has merged
• c515586|UPSTREAM: 130281: Implement chunking for gzip encoder in deferredResponseWriter: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130281 has merged
• d7c6a6a|UPSTREAM: 130190: Add a test to validate deferredResponseWriteron multiple write calls: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130190 has merged

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 711c464|UPSTREAM: : Switch test to gofuzz: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rh-roman: This pull request references OCPSTRAT-2467 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the feature to target either version "4.18." or "openshift-4.18.", but it targets "openshift-4.21" instead.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rh-roman: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1610 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rh-roman: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1610 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

Due to significant customer need for performance improvements related to API server pressure from large LIST requests, backporting the API streaming features that have been introduced in 1.33/1.34 related to kubernetes/enhancements#3157

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[rh-roman]

/retest

[openshift-ci-robot]

@rh-roman: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

• 64d5177|UPSTREAM: 130220: Add tests for encoding collections in JSON for KEP-5116: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130220 has merged
• 72e2091|UPSTREAM: 129334: Streaming JSON encoder for List: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#129334 has merged
• 98839a9|UPSTREAM: 130511: Implement tests for encoding collections in Proto: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130511 has merged
• c515586|UPSTREAM: 130281: Implement chunking for gzip encoder in deferredResponseWriter: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130281 has merged
• d735a8f|UPSTREAM: 129407: Implement streaming proto encoding: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#129407 has merged
• d7c6a6a|UPSTREAM: 130190: Add a test to validate deferredResponseWriteron multiple write calls: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#130190 has merged

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

• 6664c46|UPSTREAM: : Switch test to gofuzz: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

[openshift-ci]

@rh-roman: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6	6664c46	link	true	/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.