Skip to content

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5064

/assign openshift-ci-robot

Even though configure-ovs uses in-memory profiles to ensure we are
starting with a clean slate on each boot, the OVS database may still
have leftover artifacts in it. This causes issues if you try to
switch to using NMState to manage br-ex because the entries conflict
with what NMState does.

This patch simply adds a call to delete br-ex from the ovsdb if it
exists when we apply an NMState configuration.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 29, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Ignoring requests to cherry-pick non-bug issues: OPNET-681
Detected clone of Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57484 with correct target version. Will retitle the PR to link to the clone.
/retitle [release-4.19] OPNET-681,OCPBUGS-59928: Support migration to NMState

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5064

/assign openshift-ci-robot

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.19] OPNET-681,OCPBUGS-57484: Support migration to NMState [release-4.19] OPNET-681,OCPBUGS-59928: Support migration to NMState Jul 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 29, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references OPNET-681 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57484 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5064

/assign openshift-ci-robot

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from djoshy and dkhater-redhat July 29, 2025 14:50
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label backport-risk-assessed

If we are planning to backport all the way to 4.16, should probably indicate via target backport versions in https://issues.redhat.com//browse/OCPBUGS-57484

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jul 30, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 30, 2025
@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved
/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. labels Jul 30, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 30, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references OPNET-681 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5064

/assign openshift-ci-robot

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 30, 2025

@rbbratta: This pull request references OPNET-681 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rbbratta
Copy link
Contributor

rbbratta commented Aug 1, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 1, 2025

@rbbratta: This pull request references OPNET-681 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 4, 2025

@mkowalski: This pull request references OPNET-681 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 4, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 4, 2025

@mkowalski: This pull request references OPNET-681 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target either version "4.19." or "openshift-4.19.", but it targets "openshift-4.20" instead.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.19.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57484 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-57484 targets the "4.20.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.20.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @rbbratta

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from rbbratta August 4, 2025 09:11
@mkowalski
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mkowalski, openshift-cherrypick-robot, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e00a00d and 2 for PR HEAD 53a9e68 in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 4, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 53a9e68 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl 53a9e68 link false /test e2e-gcp-op-ocl
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change 53a9e68 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial 53a9e68 link false /test e2e-aws-serial

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD e00a00d and 2 for PR HEAD 53a9e68 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit a297a54 into openshift:release-4.19 Aug 4, 2025
18 of 22 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59928 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #5064

/assign openshift-ci-robot

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-machine-config-operator
This PR has been included in build ose-machine-config-operator-container-v4.19.0-202508042241.p0.ga297a54.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-08-05-085714

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.