-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
feat(authz): authz v2 GetBulkDecision #2448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jakedoublev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the robustness and clarity of error handling within the authorization v2 service. It refines how specific 'not found' errors are communicated to clients and improves the internal consistency and inspectability of error messages related to fully qualified names (FQNs). While the PR title suggests a new GetBulkDecision
feature, the actual changes primarily address error handling for existing decision-making logic, which is crucial for any authorization system.
Highlights
- Improved Error Handling for Authorization Decisions: The
GetDecision
andGetDecisionMultiResource
methods in the authorization service now provide more specific error responses. Instead of a genericconnect.CodeInternal
, they now returnconnect.CodeNotFound
when authorization-related errors likeaccess.ErrFQNNotFound
oraccess.ErrDefinitionNotFound
occur. This helps clients differentiate between internal server issues and resource/definition not found scenarios. - Refined Error Messaging and Wrapping: The error message for
access.ErrFQNNotFound
has been slightly reworded for clarity. Additionally, the way this error is wrapped inpdp.go
has been updated to usefmt.Errorf
with the%w
verb, ensuring proper error chaining and making it easier to inspect the underlying cause of an error.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Authz checks the path, Errors now show clear intent, Code finds its true way.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request primarily refines error handling within the authorization service (v2), particularly for GetDecision
and GetDecisionMultiResource
methods. Key improvements include:
- Specific Error Codes:
access.ErrFQNNotFound
andaccess.ErrDefinitionNotFound
now result inconnect.CodeNotFound
being returned to the client, which is more informative than a generic internal server error. - Improved Error Messages: The message for
ErrFQNNotFound
has been made more generic. - Correct Error Wrapping: Errors are now properly wrapped in
service/internal/access/v2/pdp.go
, enabling robust error checking usingerrors.Is
.
These changes enhance the API's clarity and usability for clients.
Important Considerations:
- PR Title Mismatch: The current title, "feat(authz): authz v2 GetBulkDecision," does not seem to align with the implemented changes, which are focused on error handling in existing endpoints. Please consider updating the title to accurately reflect the scope of this PR.
- PR Description & Checklist: The pull request description is empty, and the checklist items (unit tests, integration tests, documentation) are unchecked. It's important to:
- Provide a clear description of the changes and their rationale.
- Ensure that unit tests are added or updated to cover these new error handling paths, specifically verifying that
connect.CodeNotFound
is returned under the new conditions. - Update any relevant documentation if these error code changes impact API contracts or behavior.
Overall, the code changes are beneficial for error reporting and handling.
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces the GetBulkDecision
RPC, enhances error reporting by using more specific gRPC codes, and updates associated unit tests. The core functionality seems well-implemented. The primary concern is the direct modification of shared test data in Test_GetDecisionBulkRequest_Succeeds
, which could lead to flaky tests; this should be addressed by cloning test objects before modification. The TODO
regarding performance in GetBulkDecision
is noted and seems appropriate for a follow-up.
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
Benchmark results, click to expandBenchmark authorization.GetDecisions Results:
Benchmark authorization.v2.GetMultiResourceDecision Results:
Standard Benchmark Metrics Skipped or FailedBulk Benchmark Results
TDF3 Benchmark Results:
NANOTDF Benchmark Results:
|
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.7.0](service/v0.6.0...service/v0.7.0) (2025-06-24) ### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES * **policy:** disable kas grants in favor of key mappings ([#2220](#2220)) ### Features * **authz:** Add caching to keycloak ERS ([#2466](#2466)) ([f5b0a06](f5b0a06)) * **authz:** auth svc registered resource GetDecision support ([#2392](#2392)) ([5405674](5405674)) * **authz:** authz v2 GetBulkDecision ([#2448](#2448)) ([0da3363](0da3363)) * **authz:** cache entitlement policy within authorization service ([#2457](#2457)) ([c16361c](c16361c)) * **authz:** ensure logging parity between authz v2 and v1 ([#2443](#2443)) ([ef68586](ef68586)) * **core:** add cache manager ([#2449](#2449)) ([2b062c5](2b062c5)) * **core:** consume RPC interceptor request context metadata in logging ([#2442](#2442)) ([2769c48](2769c48)) * **core:** DSPX-609 - add cli-client to keycloak provisioning ([#2396](#2396)) ([48e7489](48e7489)) * **core:** ERS cache setup, fix cache initialization ([#2458](#2458)) ([d0c6938](d0c6938)) * inject logger and cache manager to key managers ([#2461](#2461)) ([9292162](9292162)) * **kas:** expose provider config from key details. ([#2459](#2459)) ([0e7d39a](0e7d39a)) * **main:** Add Close() method to cache manager ([#2465](#2465)) ([32630d6](32630d6)) * **policy:** disable kas grants in favor of key mappings ([#2220](#2220)) ([30f8cf5](30f8cf5)) * **policy:** Restrict deletion of pc with used key. ([#2414](#2414)) ([3b40a46](3b40a46)) * **sdk:** allow Connect-Protocol-Version RPC header for cors ([#2437](#2437)) ([4bf241e](4bf241e)) ### Bug Fixes * **core:** remove generics on new platform cache manager and client ([#2456](#2456)) ([98c3c16](98c3c16)) * **core:** replace opentdf-public client with cli-client ([#2422](#2422)) ([fb18525](fb18525)) * **deps:** bump github.com/casbin/casbin/v2 from 2.106.0 to 2.107.0 in /service in the external group ([#2416](#2416)) ([43afd48](43afd48)) * **deps:** bump github.com/opentdf/platform/protocol/go from 0.4.0 to 0.5.0 in /service ([#2470](#2470)) ([3a73fc9](3a73fc9)) * **deps:** bump github.com/opentdf/platform/sdk from 0.4.7 to 0.5.0 in /service ([#2473](#2473)) ([ad37476](ad37476)) * **deps:** bump the external group across 1 directory with 2 updates ([#2450](#2450)) ([9d8d1f1](9d8d1f1)) * **deps:** bump the external group across 1 directory with 2 updates ([#2472](#2472)) ([d45b3c8](d45b3c8)) * only request a token when near expiration ([#2370](#2370)) ([556d95e](556d95e)) * **policy:** fix casing bug and get provider config on update. ([#2403](#2403)) ([a52b8f9](a52b8f9)) * **policy:** properly formatted pem in test fixtures ([#2409](#2409)) ([54ffd23](54ffd23)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: opentdf-automation[bot] <149537512+opentdf-automation[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Proposed Changes
NotFound
instead ofInternal
gRPC code when FQN in GetDecision not found in policyGetBulkDecision
GetBulkDecision
Checklist
Testing Instructions