Skip to content

Split SDK into multiple projects #24

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 3, 2020

Conversation

jmrodri
Copy link
Member

@jmrodri jmrodri commented May 28, 2020

This is the overarching enhancement that will plan how to split functionality out of the current operator-sdk project into separate projects. The initial thought on component breakdown mirrors the kubebuilder and controller-runtime projects:

  1. Common libraries and operator building blocks
  2. Project scaffolding and the main SDK CLI
  3. Helm operator library and scaffolding plugin
  4. Ansible operator library and scaffolding plugin

@jmrodri jmrodri changed the title Split SDK into multiple projects [WIP] Split SDK into multiple projects May 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 28, 2020
@jmrodri jmrodri changed the title [WIP] Split SDK into multiple projects Split SDK into multiple projects Jun 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 2, 2020
@jmrodri jmrodri requested a review from asmacdo June 2, 2020 02:48
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This shows fine for me. Regards the docs see: https://github.com/operator-framework/enhancements/pull/24/files#r433788330

Otherwise:
/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2020
Copy link
Member

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few points need clarification, otherwise lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 3, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@jmrodri jmrodri merged commit c4adf16 into operator-framework:master Jun 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants