-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
📖[Docs] How-to: Z-stream Automatic Updates #1219
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
📖[Docs] How-to: Z-stream Automatic Updates #1219
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1219 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 76.53% 76.49% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 40 40
Lines 2340 2340
==========================================
- Hits 1791 1790 -1
- Misses 392 393 +1
Partials 157 157
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
sourceType: Catalog | ||
catalog: | ||
packageName: argocd-operator | ||
version: “~2.3" # Automatically upgrade patch releases for v2.3 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is 2.3.x
equivalent to this?
Should we document all the semantic ways to achieve "z-stream automatic updates"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we need to document the synonyms for a particular version range. I think one example is sufficient here. The API reference will document all the ways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that was my thought process as well. I think it's best to give folks one way of doing things (even if there are multiple - and document that elsewhere). Options lead to stress XD - having said that, is 2.3.x prettier?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think ~2.3
is fine. it's 1 character shorter :P
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <[email protected]>
3bd28c3
to
d10752e
Compare
9c6d4ce
Description
Closes #1128
Reviewer Checklist