Skip to content

🐛 [Monorepo] fix: add ginkgo as a bingo dependency for catalogd #1635

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Jan 17, 2025

The tests were failing silently with the following error: trace -vv test/upgrade
bash: line 1: trace: command not found

This issue occurred because Ginkgo was not found to execute the tests with the specified options. For example: $(GINKGO) $(E2E_FLAGS) -trace -vv $(FOCUS) test/upgrade

Example:

Before this PR

Screenshot 2025-01-17 at 01 14 22

Now:
Screenshot 2025-01-17 at 01 35 32

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2025 01:10
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title fix: add ginkgo as a bingo dependency for catalogd 🐛 [Monorepo] fix: add ginkgo as a bingo dependency for catalogd Jan 17, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 94ccb2c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/olmv1/deploys/678a96fe4220bb000849170e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1635--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

c/c @azych could you give a hand here since you were terrific and spot this one !!!!
Again, thank you a lot for finding it.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.72%. Comparing base (c8380d2) to head (94ccb2c).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1635      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.70%   66.72%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        4595     4595              
==========================================
+ Hits         3065     3066       +1     
+ Misses       1304     1303       -1     
  Partials      226      226              
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 53.25% <ø> (ø)
unit 53.68% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@azych
Copy link
Contributor

azych commented Jan 17, 2025

c/c @azych could you give a hand here since you were terrific and spot this one !!!! Again, thank you a lot for finding it.

thank you for fixing this, LGTM :)

The tests were failing silently with the following error: trace -vv test/upgrade
bash: line 1: trace: command not found

This issue occurred because Ginkgo was not found to execute the tests with the specified options.
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
The tests were failing silently with the following error: trace -vv test/upgrade
bash: line 1: trace: command not found

This issue occurred because Ginkgo was not found to execute the tests with the specified options.
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jan 17, 2025
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into operator-framework:main with commit 33aae8d Jan 17, 2025
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants