ENH: Series Creation Does Not Intelligently Handle datetime.date

[cancan101]

For example:

In [77]: pd.Series([datetime.datetime(2012, 1, 1)]).dtype
Out[77]: dtype('<M8[ns]')

works as expected.

However:

In [78]: pd.Series([datetime.date(2012, 1, 1)]).dtype
Out[78]: dtype('O')

create a Series of type object rather than datetime64.

You can get the desired effect:

In [89]: pd.Series(np.array([np.datetime64(datetime.date(2012, 1, 1))])).dtype
Out[89]: dtype('<M8[D]')

[jreback]

there is nothing wrong with datetime.date, but it REALLY should be passed as a datetime.datetime. Its very hard to do this 'automatically' because there is nothing technically wrong with allowing it in (its just dtyped == object).

OTOH maybe should just do this conversion .....

and your dtype in 89 will just not work; its not a valid dtype (well in 0.11 it causes subtle issues), in 0.12 I think this will raise (but'll I'll add this as an enhancement issue)

[cancan101]

Why do you think that it should be passed in as datetime.datetime rather than datetime.date? There is something to be said about maintaining the precision of the observation as being an entire day rather than a specific point in time.

Numpy theoretically supports this notion with time units: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/reference/arrays.datetime.html#datetime-units

[jreback]

http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/gotchas.html#timestamp-limitations

[jreback]

http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/timeseries.html#time-span-representation

[cancan101]

Here is perhaps a cleaner example. I do think that auto conversion COULD be performed:

pd.DataFrame([[date(2012,1,1)]]).dtypes
Out[14]: 
0    object
dtype: object

pd.DataFrame([[datetime.combine(date(2012,1,1), time(0,0,0))]]).dtypes
Out[15]: 
0    datetime64[ns]
dtype: object

[jtratner]

You can put something together for 0.14 if you want

[cancan101]

Sounds good. I imagine this should not be too hard.
On Nov 4, 2013 9:38 PM, "Jeff Tratner" notifications@github.com wrote:

You can put something together for 0.14 if you want

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/4338#issuecomment-27743286
.

[jtratner]

I know @jreback has had a pretty good sense of what we want to support for
dates, so I'm going to defer to him on this though.