Skip to content

DOC: sponsor notice #11650

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2015
Merged

DOC: sponsor notice #11650

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 20, 2015

Conversation

jreback
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback commented Nov 19, 2015

@jreback jreback added the Docs label Nov 19, 2015
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.17.1 milestone Nov 19, 2015
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@
v0.17.1 (November 21, 2015)
---------------------------

.. note::

We are proud to announce that *pandas* has become a sponsored project of the not-for-profit [NUMFocus organization](http://numfocus.org/news/2015/10/09/numfocus-announces-new-fiscally-sponsored-project-pandas/). This will help ensure the success of development of *pandas* as a world-class open-source project.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need to be a restructured text link, not markdown.

@shoyer
Copy link
Member

shoyer commented Nov 20, 2015

Seems like a good idea to me

jreback added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2015
@jreback jreback merged commit 677ff75 into pandas-dev:master Nov 20, 2015
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Nov 20, 2015

@jorisvandenbossche @TomAugspurger

anyone see what's wrong with this link? at the top
http://pandas-docs.github.io/pandas-docs-travis/whatsnew.html

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

:: _numfocus organization: should be
.. _numfocus organization: I think.

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

@jreback I already fixed it, but it is still in the build queue I suppose, so it is not yet fixed online

and indeed, @TomAugspurger is correct

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Nov 20, 2015

@jorisvandenbossche oh, I just pushed the fix :)

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

but in the wrong direction! :-) (you made it incorrect again)

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Nov 20, 2015

@jorisvandenbossche oh really? shoot. ok how about your turn :)

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Reverting on master is bad practice I suppose?

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Nov 20, 2015

no it's fine go ahead

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants