Skip to content

Conversation

EricChea
Copy link
Contributor

@EricChea EricChea commented Feb 21, 2018

What's this PR do?

Fixes the output of to_csv to show the value instead of the tuple when a DataFrame or Series is constructed using a MultiIndex with one level. Although, I'm not sure if it's more desirable to require a MultiIndex to be instantiated with more than one level in the future.

@jreback jreback added Output-Formatting __repr__ of pandas objects, to_string IO CSV read_csv, to_csv MultiIndex labels Feb 22, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #19831 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #19831      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.21%   92.21%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       51173    51176       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        47190    47192       +2     
- Misses       3983     3984       +1
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.64% <100%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
#single 42.23% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/indexes/multi.py 95.38% <100%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
pandas/core/dtypes/base.py 100% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/dtypes/missing.py 93.1% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/dtypes/inference.py 98.38% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/dtypes/dtypes.py 95.61% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/dtypes/common.py 94.37% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/dtypes/cast.py 88.92% <0%> (ø) ⬆️
pandas/core/dtypes/concat.py 96.34% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update de39bfc...bdc20d4. Read the comment docs.

@TomAugspurger
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed the merge conflict, and the whatsnew note.

Ping on green.

Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you rebase on master and will have a look

@pep8speaks
Copy link

Hello @EricChea! Thanks for updating the PR.

@gfyoung gfyoung modified the milestones: 0.25.0, 0.24.0 Oct 31, 2018
@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Oct 31, 2018

@jreback @TomAugspurger : Addressed all comments. Everything is green except for the fact that hypothesis is timing out on an unrelated test:

https://travis-ci.org/pandas-dev/pandas/jobs/448750638#L2895

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Oct 31, 2018

i thought the hypothesis stuff was fixed for timeout
can we do a precursor PR to address this?

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Oct 31, 2018

i thought the hypothesis stuff was fixed for timeout

I'm pretty sure it was fixed but not sure why it's complaining:

hypothesis.settings.register_profile(

cc @Zac-HD

Display the level by itself instead of as a tuple
(i.e. "squash" the MultiIndex into a single level)

Closes gh-19589.
@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Oct 31, 2018

@jreback @TomAugspurger : Everything is green now. Maybe Travis was just acting up. PTAL.

@Zac-HD
Copy link
Contributor

Zac-HD commented Oct 31, 2018

Gah, it's warning about the not-yet-enforced deadline setting, which -Werror is turning into an error. This is almost certainly just due to a slow VM on Travis, but if you want I can open a PR to fix that this evening 😞

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Oct 31, 2018

This is almost certainly just due to a slow VM on Travis

@Zac-HD : Indeed, that is what I suspect as well. If you could open a PR to make our tests more robust against this, that would be great!

@jreback jreback merged commit 16c0bbb into pandas-dev:master Nov 1, 2018
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Nov 1, 2018

thanks @EricChea , @Zac-HD , and @gfyoung

tm9k1 pushed a commit to tm9k1/pandas that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
Display the level by itself instead of as a tuple
(i.e. "squash" the MultiIndex into a single level)

Closes pandas-devgh-19589.
Pingviinituutti pushed a commit to Pingviinituutti/pandas that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
Display the level by itself instead of as a tuple
(i.e. "squash" the MultiIndex into a single level)

Closes pandas-devgh-19589.
Pingviinituutti pushed a commit to Pingviinituutti/pandas that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
Display the level by itself instead of as a tuple
(i.e. "squash" the MultiIndex into a single level)

Closes pandas-devgh-19589.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
IO CSV read_csv, to_csv MultiIndex Output-Formatting __repr__ of pandas objects, to_string
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

to_csv() with a single level row MultiIndex does not produce the desired output
6 participants