Skip to content

DOC: add cross references to advanced.rst #22671

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2018

Conversation

topper-123
Copy link
Contributor

IMO the MultiIndex / Advanced Indexing section of the docs are a bit thin on cross references, so it's too difficult to make deeper looks into the API, when you are in doubt.

I've added cross references. They're added relatively sparingly, typically only the first time a concept/class type is mentioned in the document.

Copy link
Member

@gfyoung gfyoung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Sep 12, 2018

merge on green

@topper-123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Green

@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Sep 12, 2018

@topper-123 : Slow down, not quite 🙂 . AppVeyor isn't quite done yet AFAICT.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #22671 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #22671   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.17%   92.17%           
=======================================
  Files         169      169           
  Lines       50708    50708           
=======================================
  Hits        46740    46740           
  Misses       3968     3968
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 90.58% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
#single 42.35% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 73dd6ec...56f73b2. Read the comment docs.

@topper-123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah! I was on mobile and saw the green check for ‘approved’, which is identical to the one for when tests pass...

Anyway, tests are green now 😉

@gfyoung gfyoung merged commit b23a0e8 into pandas-dev:master Sep 12, 2018
@gfyoung
Copy link
Member

gfyoung commented Sep 12, 2018

@topper-123 : Indeed, they are. Thanks!

@gfyoung gfyoung added this to the 0.24.0 milestone Sep 12, 2018
@topper-123 topper-123 deleted the advanced.rst branch September 12, 2018 06:03
aeltanawy pushed a commit to aeltanawy/pandas that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2018
Sup3rGeo pushed a commit to Sup3rGeo/pandas that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants