Skip to content

Backport PR #60186: TST: Skip flaky offset test case on WASM #60207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Backport PR #60186: TST: Skip flaky offset test case on WASM #60207

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions pandas/tests/tseries/offsets/test_offsets_properties.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7,13 +7,18 @@
You may wish to consult the previous version for inspiration on further
tests, or when trying to pin down the bugs exposed by the tests below.
"""

import zoneinfo

from hypothesis import (
assume,
given,
)
import pytest
import pytz

from pandas.compat import WASM

import pandas as pd
from pandas._testing._hypothesis import (
DATETIME_JAN_1_1900_OPTIONAL_TZ,
Expand All @@ -28,6 +33,15 @@
@given(DATETIME_JAN_1_1900_OPTIONAL_TZ, YQM_OFFSET)
def test_on_offset_implementations(dt, offset):
assume(not offset.normalize)
# This case is flaky in CI 2024-11-04
assume(
not (
WASM
and isinstance(dt.tzinfo, zoneinfo.ZoneInfo)
and dt.tzinfo.key == "Indian/Cocos"
and isinstance(offset, pd.offsets.MonthBegin)
)
)
# check that the class-specific implementations of is_on_offset match
# the general case definition:
# (dt + offset) - offset == dt
Expand Down
Loading