[TASK-8173] fix: claim flow + ui fixes #626
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@kushagrasarathe has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 33 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive UI refinements across multiple components in the mobile application. The changes focus on improving layout consistency, adding a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
kushagrasarathe
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
39-47: Improve error handling in network switching.The
checkNetworkfunction only logs errors to console, which could lead to silent failures. Consider adding proper error handling and user feedback.const checkNetwork = async (chainId: string) => { if (currentChain?.id.toString() !== chainId.toString()) { try { await switchChainAsync({ chainId: Number(chainId) }) } catch (error) { - console.error('Error switching network:', error) + console.error('Error switching network:', error) + throw new Error('Failed to switch network. Please try switching manually.') } } }src/components/Global/CopyField/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
19-24: Add aria-label for better accessibility.The copy button should have an aria-label to improve screen reader experience.
<Button variant="stroke" className="h-10 w-fit" + aria-label={isCopied ? 'Copied to clipboard' : 'Copy to clipboard'} onClick={() => {src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx (1)
Consider extracting the button with icon pattern into a shared component
The identical styling pattern is confirmed in both locations, with PaymentsFooter already having a more generic implementation. Additionally, stroke variant buttons are used across 14 different components, suggesting broader reuse potential.
src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsxsrc/components/Global/PaymentsFooter/index.tsx🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
21-26: Consider extracting shared button styles.This button styling is duplicated from PaymentsFooter. Consider creating a shared component or utility class.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find similar button style patterns rg -l 'Button.*variant="stroke".*justify-center.*text-nowrap' src/componentsLength of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the button implementation from PaymentsFooter rg -U 'Button.*variant="stroke".*justify-center.*text-nowrap' src/components/Global/PaymentsFooter/index.tsx -A 5 # Look for any existing shared button components fd -e tsx -e ts "Button" src/components/shared # Search for more similar patterns with a broader criteria rg -l 'Button.*variant="stroke"' src/componentsLength of output: 1264
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
583-584: Remove duplicate fee section.There are two identical fee sections in the UI. This duplication should be removed to improve maintainability.
Also applies to: 585-586
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
71-91: Add security and accessibility attributes to external links.The external links (transaction details and Discord) should include security and accessibility attributes.
- <Link className="cursor-pointer underline" href={explorerUrlWithTx}> + <Link + className="cursor-pointer underline" + href={explorerUrlWithTx} + aria-label={`View transaction ${utils.shortenAddressLong(transactionHash ?? '')} on block explorer`} + > - href="https://discord.gg/BX9Ak7AW28" + href="https://discord.gg/BX9Ak7AW28" + rel="noopener noreferrer" + aria-label="Join our Discord community"Also applies to: 113-121
src/components/Global/CopyField/index.tsx (1)
15-16: Consider extracting fixed heights to theme constants.The hardcoded
h-10values should be moved to theme constants for better maintainability. This applies to both the container and BaseInput.src/app/(mobile-ui)/layout.tsx (1)
82-82: Consider showing loading state for better UX.The button is still disabled during login but no longer shows a loading indicator. This might confuse users about the system's state.
- // loading={isLoggingIn} + loading={isLoggingIn}src/components/Global/ValidatedInput/index.tsx (1)
95-96: Consider using twMerge for outer div className.The outer div's className could benefit from using twMerge to handle conditional classes more efficiently.
- className={`relative w-full border border-n-1 focus:border-purple-1 dark:border-white ${ - value && !isValidating && !isValid && debouncedValue === value ? ' border-red dark:border-red' : '' - } ${className}`} + className={twMerge( + 'relative w-full border border-n-1 focus:border-purple-1 dark:border-white', + value && !isValidating && !isValid && debouncedValue === value && 'border-red dark:border-red', + className + )}src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (1)
49-59: Remove duplicate success message.The success message is duplicated in both
Card.Descriptionand the labels below. Consider removing one instance to avoid redundancy.<Card.Header> <Card.Title>Yay!</Card.Title> <Card.Description className="text-center"> Your funds are on the way. A confirmation email will be sent to {offrampForm.email} shortly. Please keep in mind that it may take up to 2 days for the funds to arrive. </Card.Description> </Card.Header> <Card.Content className="col gap-2"> - <label className="text-center text-h2">Yay!</label> - <label className="text-center text-h8 font-bold"> - Your funds are on the way. A confirmation email will be sent to {offrampForm.email} shortly. Please - keep in mind that it may take up to 2 days for the funds to arrive. - </label>src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (2)
464-483: Add autocomplete attribute for bank account inputs.Based on previous learnings, bank account input fields should use the
autocomplete="bank-account-number"attribute when the recipient type is 'us' or 'iban'.<GeneralRecipientInput className="pl-8" placeholder="wallet address / ENS / IBAN / US account number" recipient={recipient} + autocomplete={recipientType === 'us' || recipientType === 'iban' ? 'bank-account-number' : undefined} onUpdate={(update: GeneralRecipientUpdate) => {
Line range hint
587-588: Address TODO comment for points estimation.The commented-out TODO suggests incomplete functionality for points estimation. Would you like me to help implement this feature?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (21)
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/(mobile-ui)/layout.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/0_Bruddle/PageContainer.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Cashout/Components/RecipientInfo.comp.tsx(0 hunks)src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Global/CopyField/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Global/PaymentsFooter/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Global/ValidatedInput/index.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Create.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/components/Cashout/Components/RecipientInfo.comp.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/GeneralViews/AlreadyPaid.view.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Create/Create.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx (2)
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#551
File: src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx:151-156
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T17:19:18.532Z
Learning: In the `InitialView` component at `src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx`, when setting the default chain and token in the `useEffect` triggered by `isPeanutWallet`, it's acceptable to omit the setters from the dependency array and not include additional error handling for invalid defaults.
Learnt from: jjramirezn
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#410
File: src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx:87-93
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:39:20.720Z
Learning: When refactoring to eliminate code duplication, prioritize readability and consider whether the change significantly improves the code. If it doesn't enhance readability or maintainability, it's acceptable to keep the existing code structure.
src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Hugo0
PR: peanutprotocol/peanut-ui#545
File: src/components/Global/GeneralRecipientInput/index.tsx:118-126
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T12:06:11.603Z
Learning: For bank account input fields, use `autocomplete="bank-account-number"` when the recipient type is `'us'` or `'iban'`.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/Global/ValidatedInput/index.tsx
[error] 116-116: Avoid redundant double-negation.
It is not necessary to use double-negation when a value will already be coerced to a boolean.
Unsafe fix: Remove redundant double-negation
(lint/complexity/noExtraBooleanCast)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx (2)
1-10: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are logically grouped and all dependencies are relevant for the component's functionality.
68-68: LGTM! Consistent text alignment.The centered text alignment improves visual consistency across the UI.
Also applies to: 113-121
src/components/0_Bruddle/PageContainer.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Good use of twMerge.The twMerge utility effectively handles class conflicts while maintaining flexibility through props.className.
6-6: Consider adjusting responsive width constraints.The md:*:w-2/5 constraint might be too restrictive for content-heavy pages. Consider using a more flexible width scale or adding additional breakpoints.
Run this script to check content widths across the app:
✅ Verification successful
The width constraint is appropriate for the current implementation
The 40% width constraint on medium screens and above is consistent with the application's design patterns, particularly for forms and focused content areas. The full-width layout on mobile ensures proper responsive behavior.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find components that might exceed the 40% width constraint rg -l 'w-(1/2|3/5|7/10|4/5|9/10|full)' src/componentsLength of output: 4207
src/components/Global/PaymentsFooter/index.tsx (1)
18-18: Verify text overflow handling on small screens.The
text-nowrapclass might cause content overflow on very small screens. Consider adding responsive behavior or text truncation.✅ Verification successful
text-nowrapusage is appropriate for this button componentThe implementation is correct as:
- Default text is concise ("See your payments.")
- Single-line text is preferable for action buttons
- Button layout uses flex container with proper centering
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find potential long text content in payment-related components rg -A 2 'See your payments|payment' src/components/Global/PaymentsFooterLength of output: 299
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the full component implementation cat src/components/Global/PaymentsFooter/index.tsxLength of output: 777
src/app/(mobile-ui)/layout.tsx (1)
73-74: LGTM! Text and styling improvements.The text correction and consistent underline styling enhance clarity and user experience.
src/components/Claim/Generic/AlreadyClaimed.view.tsx (2)
3-5: LGTM! Import cleanup and component additions.Imports have been cleaned up and necessary components have been added.
81-81: LGTM! Improved text alignment.The centered text alignment enhances the visual presentation of the feedback request.
src/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsx (1)
83-83: Verify mobile layout changes.The layout changes make the UI more consistent across screen sizes, but please verify:
- The centered text alignment works well with all content types
- The CopyField visibility on mobile doesn't affect the overall flow
- The removal of responsive flex-row layout for buttons maintains good spacing
Run this script to check for any responsive layout issues:
Also applies to: 114-114, 117-117
✅ Verification successful
Layout changes are consistent with mobile-first design
The changes maintain a consistent vertical layout pattern using
flex-colwith proper spacing throughgaputilities. The centered alignment and simplified structure will work well across all screen sizes.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for responsive layout patterns and potential inconsistencies # Search for responsive classes to ensure consistency rg -A 2 'md:flex-row|md:block|md:hidden' src/components/Create/Link/Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all responsive classes and flex patterns in the component rg -l 'sm:|md:|lg:|xl:' src/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsx # Check Card.Content usage patterns across the codebase ast-grep --pattern 'Card.Content className="$_"' # Look for flex-col patterns to understand layout consistency rg 'flex(?:-col)?\s+(?:gap|items|justify)' src/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsxLength of output: 487
src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
6-16: LGTM! Clean import organization.The imports are now well-organized and grouped logically.
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx (1)
62-62: LGTM! Simplified routing logic.The routing logic has been simplified by removing the conditional branching based on wallet provider type. This makes the code more maintainable and easier to understand.
src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx (2)
1-16: LGTM! Clean import organization.The imports are now well-organized and grouped logically.
171-174: LGTM! Consistent UI styling.The changes improve UI consistency by:
- Centering the description text
- Setting a minimum width for the "Go Back" button
Also applies to: 235-237
src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx (2)
262-268: LGTM! Improved UI layout.The changes enhance the visual presentation by:
- Centering the description text
- Centering the FAQ component horizontally
314-316: LGTM! Simplified account filtering.The account filtering logic has been simplified using the
!!operator for a more concise boolean conversion.src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx (1)
Line range hint
455-463: LGTM! Appropriate conditional rendering of TokenSelector.The TokenSelector is correctly shown only for non-bank transfer scenarios.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/components/Global/FlowHeader/index.tsx (1)
5-9: Consider using more specific prop types.The interface looks good, but consider using more specific types for the props:
onPrev?: VoidFunctioninstead of() => voiddisableBackBtn?: boolean(current is good)disableWalletHeader?: boolean(current is good)src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (2)
127-148: Consider improving attachment handling.Suggestions for better maintainability and accessibility:
- Extract file type checking logic to a separate utility function
- Add aria-label to the download link
- Consider using a more semantic HTML structure
-<a href={attachment.attachmentUrl} download target="_blank" className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline"> +<a + href={attachment.attachmentUrl} + download + target="_blank" + rel="noopener noreferrer" + aria-label="Download attachment" + className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline" +>
150-170: Consider memoizing complex calculations.The route display logic involves multiple lookups and calculations. Consider using useMemo for performance optimization:
+const routeDisplay = useMemo(() => { + if (!selectedRoute) return null; + return { + amount: utils.formatTokenAmount( + utils.formatAmountWithDecimals({ + amount: selectedRoute.route.estimate.toAmountMin, + decimals: selectedRoute.route.estimate.toToken.decimals, + }) + ), + symbol: selectedRoute.route.estimate.toToken.symbol, + chain: supportedSquidChainsAndTokens[selectedRoute.route.params.toChain]?.axelarChainName + }; +}, [selectedRoute]);src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
941-962: Consider improving error handling types.Good error handling implementation, but consider:
- Adding specific error types
- Extracting error messages to constants
- Adding error tracking
+type OfframpError = { + code: 'UNAVAILABLE' | 'GENERAL'; + message: string; +}; +const ERROR_MESSAGES = { + UNAVAILABLE: 'This token cannot be cashed out directly.', + GENERAL: 'An error occurred. Please try again later.', +} as const;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Global/FlowHeader/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Global/WalletHeader/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Home/WalletCard.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx(4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/Home/WalletCard.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Create/Views/Success.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Success.view.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Success.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Offramp/Success.view.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/Global/FlowHeader/index.tsx (1)
11-22: Implementation looks good!Clean implementation with:
- Proper conditional rendering of the back button
- Good use of flex layout for alignment
- Smart width adjustment of WalletHeader based on back button presence
src/components/Global/WalletHeader/index.tsx (3)
19-22: Props interface looks good!Clean and focused interface definition with proper types.
51-59: Clean implementation of className and disabled props.Good use of:
- twMerge for class handling
- Proper prop spreading
- Consistent styling approach
63-65: Good UI improvements!Nice updates to:
- Use modern Tailwind size classes
- Improve button accessibility with proper structure
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
114-124: Good layout improvements!Nice enhancements:
- Added FlowHeader for consistent navigation
- Improved text alignment with center class
- Better visual hierarchy with line breaks
src/components/Offramp/Confirm.view.tsx (1)
652-662: Good addition of FlowHeader!Clean implementation with proper:
- State reset on navigation
- Loading state handling
- Wallet header disabling
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (3)
127-149: Consider extracting attachment rendering logic into a separate component.The attachment rendering logic is complex and could be simplified by extracting it into a dedicated component for better maintainability and reusability.
+ // Create a new component AttachmentView.tsx + const AttachmentView = ({ message, attachmentUrl, fileType }) => { + return ( + <> + <div className={`flex w-full items-center justify-center gap-2 ${ + utils.checkifImageType(fileType) ? ' flex-row' : ' flex-col' + }`}> + {message && <label className="text-h8">{message}</label>} + {attachmentUrl && utils.checkifImageType(fileType) ? ( + <img src={attachmentUrl} className="h-18 w-18" alt="attachment" /> + ) : ( + <a + href={attachmentUrl} + download + target="_blank" + className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline" + > + <Icon name={'download'} /> + Download attachment + </a> + )} + </div> + <div className="flex w-full border-t border-dotted border-black" /> + </> + ); + }; - {(attachment.message || attachment.attachmentUrl) && ( - <> - <div className={...}> - {/* ... current attachment rendering logic ... */} - </div> - <div className="flex w-full border-t border-dotted border-black" /> - </> - )} + {(attachment.message || attachment.attachmentUrl) && ( + <AttachmentView + message={attachment.message} + attachmentUrl={attachment.attachmentUrl} + fileType={fileType} + /> + )}
182-216: Consider extracting route information display into a separate component.The route information display logic is complex and could be extracted into a dedicated component for better maintainability.
+ // Create a new component RouteInfoView.tsx + const RouteInfoView = ({ selectedRoute, supportedPeanutChains, supportedSquidChainsAndTokens }) => { + return ( + <div className="flex w-full flex-row items-center justify-between px-2 text-h8 text-gray-1"> + {/* ... current route display logic ... */} + </div> + ); + }; - {selectedRoute && ( - <div className="flex w-full flex-row items-center justify-between px-2 text-h8 text-gray-1"> - {/* ... current route display logic ... */} - </div> - )} + {selectedRoute && ( + <RouteInfoView + selectedRoute={selectedRoute} + supportedPeanutChains={consts.supportedPeanutChains} + supportedSquidChainsAndTokens={supportedSquidChainsAndTokens} + /> + )}
Line range hint
228-247: Track the points estimation implementation as a separate task.The commented-out points estimation code should be properly tracked and implemented in a follow-up task.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of the points estimation feature?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx(1 hunks)src/app/(mobile-ui)/layout.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx(3 hunks)src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Global/WalletHeader/index.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Create.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (11)
- src/app/(mobile-ui)/home/page.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Success.view.tsx
- src/app/(mobile-ui)/layout.tsx
- src/components/Request/Create/Views/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Global/WalletHeader/index.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Input.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Create/Create.tsx
- src/components/Cashout/Components/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Create/Link/Confirm.view.tsx
- src/components/Claim/Link/Initial.view.tsx
- src/components/Request/Pay/Views/Initial.view.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM! The FlowHeader integration improves UI consistency.The addition of FlowHeader and the new wrapper structure aligns well with the PR's UI standardization objectives.
Also applies to: 114-115
117-124: LGTM! Clean and well-structured card header.The centered text alignment and structured layout improve readability.
253-257: LGTM! Well-implemented error handling and user feedback.The error state management and user feedback implementation follow React best practices.
|
@jjramirezn should be fixed now, it was being weird, worked well locally but on deployment nooo 💀 
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (2)
136-144: Consider improving download link accessibility.The download link's color (
text-gray-1) might have insufficient contrast with the background, potentially causing accessibility issues.Consider using a darker color or increasing the contrast ratio:
- className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-1 underline " + className="flex w-full cursor-pointer flex-row items-center justify-center gap-1 text-h9 font-normal text-gray-2 underline "
253-257: Enhance error message visibility.While the error handling logic is solid, the error message styling could be improved for better visibility.
Consider adding a background color and padding to make the error message stand out:
- <div className="text-center"> + <div className="text-center bg-red/10 p-2 rounded-md">
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/components/Claim/Link/Onchain/Confirm.view.tsx (5)
4-4: LGTM! Improved navigation structure.The addition of
FlowHeaderand the new wrapper div improves navigation consistency across the application.Also applies to: 114-115
117-124: LGTM! Enhanced readability with centered layout.The card header's centered layout with proper line breaks improves the visual hierarchy and readability of the token transfer information.
Line range hint
228-247: Address TODO comment for points estimation.The points estimation feature is currently commented out. This might affect user engagement and rewards tracking.
Would you like me to help implement the points estimation logic or create a GitHub issue to track this task?
Line range hint
93-112: Review commented file type detection code.The commented useEffect hook for file type detection might affect the attachment preview functionality. Consider either implementing it properly or removing it if no longer needed.
Let's check if this functionality is implemented elsewhere:
150-170: Verify cross-chain token amount calculations.The code handles both direct and cross-chain claims. Let's verify the token amount calculations across different chains.
✅ Verification successful
Token amount calculations are properly implemented
The code correctly handles token amounts for both direct and cross-chain claims:
- Direct claims preserve token decimals and use proper formatting
- Cross-chain claims correctly convert amounts using Squid's route estimation with proper decimal handling
- Both paths use consistent formatting utilities that respect token-specific decimal places
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for token amount calculation implementations across the codebase # Search for token amount formatting functions rg -A 5 "formatTokenAmount|formatAmountWithDecimals" --type typescript # Search for cross-chain token conversion logic ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($$params) { $$$ toAmountMin $$$ }'Length of output: 182
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for token formatting utility functions rg -t ts -t tsx "formatTokenAmount|formatAmountWithDecimals" -A 5 # Search for route estimation and conversion logic rg -t ts -t tsx "toAmountMin|estimate\.to" -A 5 # Search for decimal handling rg -t ts -t tsx "decimals.*token" -A 5Length of output: 242
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for utils files fd "utils" --extension ts --extension tsx # Search for token formatting and calculations rg "formatTokenAmount|formatAmountWithDecimals" --type-add 'script:*.{ts,tsx}' # Search for route estimation logic rg "toAmountMin|estimate" --type-add 'script:*.{ts,tsx}'Length of output: 17383
fixes these issues:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Based on the comprehensive summary, here are the updated release notes:
UI/UX Improvements
FlowHeadercomponent across multiple views to enhance navigation and user experience.Component Enhancements
WalletHeaderandValidatedInputcomponents with more flexible styling.Styling Updates
Minor Fixes
These changes focus on improving the overall user interface and experience without significant functional modifications.