fix(log): remove the value from the log of etcd worker put key (#12311) #12314
Conversation
ti-chi-bot
added
lgtm
release-note-none
|
This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by triage owners. To merge this cherry pick:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a logging issue by removing the value associated with etcd "put key" operations from the logs. This change improves data security and reduces log verbosity without impacting core functionality.
Highlights
- Logging Privacy: The etcd worker's logging for "put key" operations has been updated to no longer include the value of the key being put. This enhances data privacy by preventing potentially sensitive data from being written to logs.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request removes the logging of the value field for put operations in the etcd_worker. This is a good practice to avoid logging potentially large or sensitive data. I've suggested an improvement to also log the length of the value, which can be useful for debugging without exposing the full content. Otherwise, the change is correct.
| logFn("[etcd worker] delete key", zap.ByteString("key", op.KeyBytes())) | ||
| } else { | ||
| logFn("[etcd worker] put key", zap.ByteString("key", op.KeyBytes()), zap.ByteString("value", op.ValueBytes())) | ||
| logFn("[etcd worker] put key", zap.ByteString("key", op.KeyBytes())) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While removing the full value from the log is a good idea for security and to avoid excessive log sizes, it can sometimes be useful for debugging to know the size of the value being written. Consider logging the length of the value instead, which provides useful metadata without logging the entire value.
| logFn("[etcd worker] put key", zap.ByteString("key", op.KeyBytes())) | |
| logFn("[etcd worker] put key", zap.ByteString("key", op.KeyBytes()), zap.Int("value_len", len(op.ValueBytes()))) |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kennytm, wlwilliamx The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
3 participants
This is an automated cherry-pick of #12311
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #12309
What is changed and how it works?
Remove the value from the log of etcd worker put key.
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
No.
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
No.
Release note