-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 294
Make sprockets dependency optional #412
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@ldlsegovia @GabrielLyonB et al... this PR removes a dependency upon Could you approve this and merge it in? |
Sorry, I just realized that I created the PR based on my master branch where I pushed lots of other changes I need for my project. Unfortunately, it seems that |
@joker-777 So sad-- we really liked your changes here! |
Thanks, maybe I will create another PR but I doubt that there is anyone maintaining this repository. |
@joker-777 We're still alive, thankfully :) Creating a new PR with the sprockets related changes sounds good. |
@ldlsegovia This is good news!!! I will try to create a new PR then. |
Hi all, sorry for the late comment. Wanted to let you know that we are planning a beta release for a new major version of this gem, which will drop support for sprockets, among other things. Theses changes will include the removal of sassc and sassc-rails dependencies. We’ll leave the related issues open for now, at least until the release of this version, but will be closing related PRs, as we might need to include similar changes in the removal of sprockets support. |
It looks like sprockets will be soon replaced by propshaft. It would be great if we could make the sprockets dependency optional. (#403)