Skip to content

Conversation

igchor
Copy link

@igchor igchor commented Feb 7, 2022

It fails because CentOS is EOL. We might want to consider
using CentOS Streams but for now, just remove it.

Right now, we rely on build-cachelib-centos workflow anyway.


This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@victoria-mcgrath victoria-mcgrath left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @igchor)

@victoria-mcgrath victoria-mcgrath merged commit c2819d2 into pmem:develop Feb 7, 2022
It fails because CentOS is EOL. We might want to consider
using CentOS Streams but for now, just remove it.

Right now, we rely on build-cachelib-centos workflow anyway.
vinser52 pushed a commit to vinser52/CacheLib that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2022
It fails because CentOS is EOL. We might want to consider
using CentOS Streams but for now, just remove it.

Right now, we rely on build-cachelib-centos workflow anyway.
guptask pushed a commit to guptask/CacheLib that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2022
It fails because CentOS is EOL. We might want to consider
using CentOS Streams but for now, just remove it.

Right now, we rely on build-cachelib-centos workflow anyway.
vinser52 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2022
It fails because CentOS is EOL. We might want to consider
using CentOS Streams but for now, just remove it.

Right now, we rely on build-cachelib-centos workflow anyway.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants