-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
refactor: addition of rbac needed for instascale controller #304
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
1c2317d
b3ae92b
95b9201
ae38143
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ | ||
--- | ||
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 | ||
kind: ClusterRole | ||
metadata: | ||
creationTimestamp: null | ||
name: instascale-role | ||
rules: | ||
- apiGroups: | ||
- "" | ||
resources: | ||
- nodes | ||
verbs: | ||
- get | ||
- list | ||
- patch | ||
- update | ||
- apiGroups: | ||
- "" | ||
resources: | ||
- secrets | ||
verbs: | ||
- get | ||
- apiGroups: | ||
- apps | ||
resources: | ||
- machineset | ||
verbs: | ||
- create | ||
- delete | ||
- get | ||
- list | ||
- patch | ||
- update | ||
- watch | ||
- apiGroups: | ||
- apps | ||
resources: | ||
- machineset/status | ||
verbs: | ||
- get | ||
- apiGroups: | ||
- config.openshift.io | ||
resources: | ||
- clusterversions | ||
verbs: | ||
- get | ||
- list | ||
- watch | ||
- apiGroups: | ||
- machine.openshift.io | ||
resources: | ||
- controlplanemachinesets | ||
- machinehealthchecks | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Are these two resources really used by InstaScale? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I should have specified I've pushed this as myself and mark are testing which are actually used and what we can cut away. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. but if you know off hand...that would save us some time? I was doubtful that we used those TBH There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. My understanding is that InstaScale only uses the Machine and MachineSet APIs but better double checking. |
||
- machines | ||
- machinesets | ||
verbs: | ||
- create | ||
- delete | ||
- get | ||
- list | ||
- patch | ||
- update | ||
- watch |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ | ||
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1 | ||
kind: ClusterRoleBinding | ||
metadata: | ||
name: instascale-rolebinding | ||
roleRef: | ||
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io | ||
kind: ClusterRole | ||
name: instascale-role | ||
subjects: | ||
- kind: ServiceAccount | ||
name: controller-manager | ||
namespace: system |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are MachineSet APIs really in the
apps
group? It seems it's a wrong duplicate of themachine.openshift.io
one.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nope, I didn't think they were in the
apps
group, I thought first class objects like replicasets, deployments etc were.but I was just copying what was in the original role to try get it working.
I can't really figure out why this is the case, even getting rid of those and allowing the wildcard on the machine.openshift.io group doesn't work and just returns the same error as ye got.
I also can't seem to find a machinepool resource for any api-group in any of the docs.
Any ideas here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I don't think the error is related to the RBAC changes. I suspect there is an issue with the OCM client configuration.