Skip to content

Allow function pointer extraction from overloaded functions #2944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 13, 2021
Merged

Allow function pointer extraction from overloaded functions #2944

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
10a1c96
Add a failure test for overloaded functions
otamachan Apr 10, 2021
3662b9c
Allow function pointer extraction from overloaded functions
otamachan Apr 10, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 11 additions & 5 deletions include/pybind11/functional.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -46,11 +46,17 @@ struct type_caster<std::function<Return(Args...)>> {
auto c = reinterpret_borrow<capsule>(PyCFunction_GET_SELF(cfunc.ptr()));
auto rec = (function_record *) c;

if (rec && rec->is_stateless &&
same_type(typeid(function_type), *reinterpret_cast<const std::type_info *>(rec->data[1]))) {
struct capture { function_type f; };
value = ((capture *) &rec->data)->f;
return true;
while (rec != nullptr) {
if (rec->is_stateless
&& same_type(typeid(function_type),
*reinterpret_cast<const std::type_info *>(rec->data[1]))) {
struct capture {
function_type f;
};
value = ((capture *) &rec->data)->f;
return true;
}
rec = rec->next;
Copy link
Collaborator

@henryiii henryiii Apr 10, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This line (and the while) is the only actual change, I think. The rest is formatting. Note that if we used clang-format, this would not randomly change. :)

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep, I feel the same.

}
}

Expand Down
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions tests/test_callbacks.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -97,6 +97,8 @@ TEST_SUBMODULE(callbacks, m) {
// test_cpp_function_roundtrip
/* Test if passing a function pointer from C++ -> Python -> C++ yields the original pointer */
m.def("dummy_function", &dummy_function);
m.def("dummy_function_overloaded", [](int i, int j) { return i + j; });
m.def("dummy_function_overloaded", &dummy_function);
m.def("dummy_function2", [](int i, int j) { return i + j; });
m.def("roundtrip", [](std::function<int(int)> f, bool expect_none = false) {
if (expect_none && f)
Expand Down
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions tests/test_callbacks.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,6 +93,10 @@ def test_cpp_function_roundtrip():
m.test_dummy_function(m.roundtrip(m.dummy_function))
== "matches dummy_function: eval(1) = 2"
)
assert (
m.test_dummy_function(m.dummy_function_overloaded)
== "matches dummy_function: eval(1) = 2"
)
assert m.roundtrip(None, expect_none=True) is None
assert (
m.test_dummy_function(lambda x: x + 2)
Expand Down