-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Get ride of "noncoordinates" as a name? #212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I'm now thinking that I would like to rename the current Once we rename |
I personally am not familiar with |
I don't think it's that terrible to be cryptic with the name for the Also, to clarify, I was thinking of only identifying non-coordinates as "variables" in |
How about calling the arrays in a Dataset "store arrays" or just "arrays" for short?
|
I guess this is coming full circle back to the name |
New proposal... don't even bother renaming |
Related: pydata#212 Dataset.variables was too confusing with our current usage of "variables", but I'm not 100% sure I'm happy with `Dataset.arrays` either. So for now, I've just renamed `Dataset._variables` to `Dataset._arrays` and removed `Dataset.variables` entirely.
@akleeman What do you think of removing access to the underlying array of |
This has been resolved per my last comment. |
As @ToddSmall has pointed out (in #202), "noncoordinates" is a confusing name -- it's something defined by what it isn't, not what it is.
Unfortunately, our best alternative is "variables", which already has a lot of meaning from the netCDF world (and which we already use).
Related: #211
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: